Can we move the 1/18 aviation posts somewhere else?
-
- Officer - 1st Lieutenant
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:00 pm
- Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Can we move the 1/18 aviation posts somewhere else?
1/18 aviation is so...dull.
Can we move the posts somewhere else?
I'm looking for 1/18 figure posts and 1/18 tiger tank posts. You know, the fun stuff! I hate it when I'm checking the post board and all I see are Mustang this and Tigercat that. (I don't even know the names of all these planes.)
They're just so...boring.
Sorry, I'm not an aviation guy.
Can we move the posts somewhere else?
I'm looking for 1/18 figure posts and 1/18 tiger tank posts. You know, the fun stuff! I hate it when I'm checking the post board and all I see are Mustang this and Tigercat that. (I don't even know the names of all these planes.)
They're just so...boring.
Sorry, I'm not an aviation guy.
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Central California
-
- Officer - 1st Lieutenant
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:00 pm
- Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Hmm
I think that's why I never got into aviation. Or naval stuff for that matter. It's all so abstracted. You drop a bomb from a plane. You fire cannons from a ship. In neither case are you up front facing the enemy head on.
In a tank, an enemy soldier can run up behind you and attack you. It's very close and personal.
Ground forces rock.
In a tank, an enemy soldier can run up behind you and attack you. It's very close and personal.
Ground forces rock.
-
- Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:50 pm
- Location: Abbotsford BC Canada
-
- Officer - Lt. Colonel
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 5:59 pm
Ummm...no. Considering there's far more 1/18th planes than 1/18th armor pieces...
Just because a certain subject is boring to me personally doesn't mean it should be removed and put in a seperate area.
I mean, the multiple Indian Jones threads are very boring and dull to me, but I just skip by them because I know others like them.

Just because a certain subject is boring to me personally doesn't mean it should be removed and put in a seperate area.
I mean, the multiple Indian Jones threads are very boring and dull to me, but I just skip by them because I know others like them.

-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Central California
Actually, dogfights in WWI, WWII, and Korea could get quite personal. Yes, the opposing pilots were in machines moving at hundreds of miles per hour, but in the end they were facing eachother man-to-man in a way that few infantry soldiers often came into contact. Air combat through much of the 20th century existed much more in the realm of single hand-to-hand combat, where the pilot's skill, cunning, and sheer agression decided the nature of a match. Outside of a few instances, modern warfare over the past 100 years has been quite impersonal as well with its massed armies and mechanization.
However, in an effort to reach common ground, since WWI both air power and ground power have grown to be inseperable to any country's armed forces wishing to wage ware effectively. You might notice that the US & Coalition ground troops in Iraq and Afghanistan still rely heavily on aircraft, whether they be combat jets, helicopters, UAVs or otherwise for reconissance and offensive or defensive air cover
However, in an effort to reach common ground, since WWI both air power and ground power have grown to be inseperable to any country's armed forces wishing to wage ware effectively. You might notice that the US & Coalition ground troops in Iraq and Afghanistan still rely heavily on aircraft, whether they be combat jets, helicopters, UAVs or otherwise for reconissance and offensive or defensive air cover

"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Central California
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3583
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:42 am
- Location: Pleasant Ridge , Ohio
Re: Hmm / AC ( ? )
dandaman wrote:I think that's why I never got into aviation. Or naval stuff for that matter. It's all so abstracted. You drop a bomb from a plane. You fire cannons from a ship. In neither case are you up front facing the enemy head on.
In a tank, an enemy soldier can run up behind you and attack you. It's very close and personal.
Ground forces rock.
>>> For many , no matter what Era or campaign ,.. "It's very close and personal".
* Especially when somebody's on your six.
Mitch v MG

" I love it , God help me ,.. I do love it so". * * * * PATTON * * * *
* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *
* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 7112
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Clear Lake, South Dakota
Re: Hmm / AC ( ? )
Mitch that is a cool way to get the point across. 

Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Let me hear your guns!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: My what?
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Your guns! Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: [fires his airplane's guns] AHHHH!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: My what?
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Your guns! Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: [fires his airplane's guns] AHHHH!
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
- Location: Washington DC area
- Contact:
Actually, that would be rather difficult to do in the WWII era of unguided gravity bombs, not impossible mind you, but a rocket attack would be far more likely to knock out a WWII tank. I don't mind the aviation related posts at all. It takes boots on the ground to win wars, true enough, but the aviation branch was, and still is an important part of the combined arms warfare concept.Boring until they drop a bomb and destroy your beloved tank
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 9679
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
- Location: New Orleans
Re: Can we move the 1/18 aviation posts somewhere else?
Hey man,dandaman wrote:1/18 aviation is so...dull.
Can we move the posts somewhere else?
I'm looking for 1/18 figure posts and 1/18 tiger tank posts. You know, the fun stuff! I hate it when I'm checking the post board and all I see are Mustang this and Tigercat that. (I don't even know the names of all these planes.)
They're just so...boring.
Sorry, I'm not an aviation guy.
Look closely at your forums' President/ Owner what do you see?
What does he do for a living ? He makes his living off of taking pictures of planes. That should tell you everything that you need to know.

-
- Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:50 pm
- Location: Abbotsford BC Canada
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:23 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Hmm
dandaman wrote: You fire cannons from a ship. In neither case are you up front facing the enemy head on.

I really doubt the crews in WW2 would agree with that, especially the ones that experienced Kamikaze attacks... That's about as "head on" as it gets and where you gonna run to? Where you gonna dig a foxhole?

-
- Officer - 1st Lieutenant
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:00 pm
- Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Gulp.
Gulp. Heh heh. Did I say I didn't like aviation? I love planes! I was just on my way to read a post about a P-51 Mustang! Yeah, that's the ticket...pickelhaube wrote:Hey man,
Look closely at your forums' President/ Owner what do you see?
What does he do for a living ? He makes his living off of taking pictures of planes. That should tell you everything that you need to know.
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
- Location: Washington DC area
- Contact:
I mean if you're talking saturation bombing like in Operation Cobra or something, then yeah ok, the Germans lost significant numbers of tanks to bombs, many were simply upended due to near misses. On the other hand, the ability of WWII fighter bombers to routinely hit a tank sized object with a single bomb was pretty slim, and a hit from a high altitude bomber was pure luck, but of course if you drop enough bombs on a tightly packed group of vehicles you're bound to hit something sooner or later. Bottom line...the level of pinpoint bombing accuracy just was not like it is nowadays.Not difficult to do, they just dropped more bombs. How many german tanks were lost to allied bombing raids?
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"
-
- Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:50 pm
- Location: Abbotsford BC Canada
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 7112
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Clear Lake, South Dakota
Re: Gulp.
dandaman wrote:Gulp. Heh heh. Did I say I didn't like aviation? I love planes! I was just on my way to read a post about a P-51 Mustang! Yeah, that's the ticket...pickelhaube wrote:Hey man,
Look closely at your forums' President/ Owner what do you see?
What does he do for a living ? He makes his living off of taking pictures of planes. That should tell you everything that you need to know.








I love that SNL skit.

Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Let me hear your guns!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: My what?
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Your guns! Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: [fires his airplane's guns] AHHHH!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: My what?
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Your guns! Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: [fires his airplane's guns] AHHHH!
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3583
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:42 am
- Location: Pleasant Ridge , Ohio
* Can't we just move on here ?
............. and then there are the QC issues !
* Willkommen aboard !
Mitch v MG
* Willkommen aboard !
Mitch v MG

" I love it , God help me ,.. I do love it so". * * * * PATTON * * * *
* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *
* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *