Scale?
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:44 pm
- Location: South Texas
Scale?
I wanted to know what the Scale would be for
B-29 Wingspan and Length in 1:18 Scale
B-17 Wingspan and Length in 1:18 Scale
B-24 Wingspan and Length in 1:18 Scale
B-25 Wingspan and Length in 1:18 Scale
And Possibly a Lancaster Wingspan and Length
Also how do you figure out the scale, divide the 1:1 numbers by 18?
This would be very helpful...Thanks
-Mike-
B-29 Wingspan and Length in 1:18 Scale
B-17 Wingspan and Length in 1:18 Scale
B-24 Wingspan and Length in 1:18 Scale
B-25 Wingspan and Length in 1:18 Scale
And Possibly a Lancaster Wingspan and Length
Also how do you figure out the scale, divide the 1:1 numbers by 18?
This would be very helpful...Thanks
-Mike-
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:44 pm
- Location: South Texas
The RC stuff tend to have larger wings in perportion to the fusaluge, because of the limits of engine power generally available. It's good to check and see if it's close enough.
Tanks for the memories
Your breachblocks so black
And oodles of track
Here at Grafenwoehr it's so good to be back
Oh, tanks for the memories..
Your breachblocks so black
And oodles of track
Here at Grafenwoehr it's so good to be back
Oh, tanks for the memories..
-
- Officer - Lt. Colonel
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Good point. If you want an accurate set of plans, make sure the plans are "true" scale. I thought I had come across a good set of dc3 plans (included rib formers, fuselage cross sections) but found that the tail fin was over sized and the engines where set further out and set at a pronounced angle when compared to smaller "true" scale drawings. They basically changed the blueprints to allow for more easier RC flight characteristics.chunks wrote:The RC stuff tend to have larger wings in perportion to the fusaluge, because of the limits of engine power generally available. It's good to check and see if it's close enough.
"you get in a steep dive in this thing and you've got almost no maneuvarabilty at all. You couldn't hit the broad side of a barn with the broad side of another barn"
-
- Officer - Captain
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:45 pm
- Location: Granite Bay
- Contact:
Dang, a 1/18 B-17 would have a wingspan over 5 feet long, and a length of over 4 feet!!!, but imagine this, the C-5 galaxy would have a wingspan of over 12 feet long!!!!, and a length of over 13 feet !!!!!! dang, but another more amazing thing would be the Spruce Goose, wing span in 1/18, get ready......Over 17 FEET LONG!!!!!!!!!!, and a length of over 12 feet, but a height of over 4 feet tall!!! DANG THAT would be huge
Great Traders List:
hworth18
raiderad16
razor17019
momaw nadon
jmd250
kimtheredxd
hworth18
raiderad16
razor17019
momaw nadon
jmd250
kimtheredxd
while r/c planes are not ideal and do often have wingspans a little out of proportion with their length, they also represent the best chance of getting large airplanes, like four engine bombers, in close to 1/18 scale and they are also good for more obscure aircraft, such as the beaufighter, which is unlikely ever to see mass production.
The EAM B-17 is perfectly proportioned and scales out to 1/17.9 in both length and wingspan. Half the work is even done for you as the fuselage and engine cowls are pre molded.
The EAM B-17 is perfectly proportioned and scales out to 1/17.9 in both length and wingspan. Half the work is even done for you as the fuselage and engine cowls are pre molded.

i never met an airplane i didn't like...
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:44 pm
- Location: South Texas
-
- Officer - Captain
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:45 pm
- Location: Granite Bay
- Contact:
-
- Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:06 am
- Location: Boynton Beach, Florida
- Contact:
-
- Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:43 pm
- Location: So. California
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 9673
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
- Location: New Orleans
I dont know about Pizzaz, but the B-52 is very ugly in my eyes, it is a just a stick with wings.
The Tu-95, now that's a beauty!
The Tu-95, now that's a beauty!
[img39]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v501/QueenofSky/BirdFlu.gif[/img39] [img39]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Acherontia_lachesis.jpg/200px-Acherontia_lachesis.jpg[/img39]
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:44 pm
- Location: South Texas
Enough fighting gentlemen, they are all great planes...But only if they make them in 1:18...Last I heard the EAM B-17 Kit was going for about $350 bucks...and the B-29 is no longer available on their site...I saw some B-52 plans on EBay for about $15.00 bucks...Has anyone seen that 8 jet engine RC B-52. I think the darn thing was worth about $100,000. I saw it on You-Tube, it was a sad site seeing that monster crash and burn...I just hope they come out with some of these larger size bombers afters the B-25, I wouldn't mind dishing out a couple Benjamin's for one...
-Mike-
-Mike-
You can get all the necessary EAM parts for the Fortress for around $275 i think. The B-29 was way over scale anyway.
The B-52 that crashed is being re-built and will supposedly be even better the next time around.
There is an approx. 1/27 scale r/c B-52 ARF coming out soon for under $800. It is about 6 feet by 7 feet.
I think 21c is going to find they have engineering problems with the B-25. Wing sag, u/c sag and gross weight being chief among them. Without using a metal wing spar i can't see how they'll make it so the wings wont sag over time. Same goes for the u/c.
A 4 engine bomber, that's not built light, like an r/c, will be very, very heavy and perhaps too heavy to be feasible, unfortunately.
The B-52 that crashed is being re-built and will supposedly be even better the next time around.
There is an approx. 1/27 scale r/c B-52 ARF coming out soon for under $800. It is about 6 feet by 7 feet.
I think 21c is going to find they have engineering problems with the B-25. Wing sag, u/c sag and gross weight being chief among them. Without using a metal wing spar i can't see how they'll make it so the wings wont sag over time. Same goes for the u/c.
A 4 engine bomber, that's not built light, like an r/c, will be very, very heavy and perhaps too heavy to be feasible, unfortunately.
i never met an airplane i didn't like...
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 9673
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
- Location: New Orleans