Will you pay extra for a detailed interior?

Your Main Forum For Discussing 1:18 Scale Military Figures and Vehicles.
Threetoughtrucks
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 5405
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:46 am
Location: SOUTH JOISEY
Contact:

Will you pay extra for a detailed interior?

Post by Threetoughtrucks » Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:40 am

I'm sure this has been covered before but it comes up again now will the great news about the B-25.

It depends really on how you will display the plane. If it is hung from a cieling, do you need any interior at all? Maybe a fixed pilot who doesn't move...but would you pay extra for a detailed interior and crew? if nobody will ever see the detail going into the interior and a full crew.

My idea is a release of a plane like the B-25 or other twin if it's too tale (I hope, I hope) in two versions, one with no interior and one detailed at the increased cost to the manufacturer (and us)., the other version with no interior. Kind of like the few tanks we have with the turret interior. We know it's there but nobody see's it. Would we pay extra for it? I would gladly.

Alot of us will display our plane on a desk, table, wall at eye level, where a full interior and crew would be appreciated and we would gladly pay extra for that version..

Comments? or is this just another rant from the crazy old guy who collects toys and little people.

TTT
Sometimes I am the windshield, sometimes, I am the bug.

Quixote511
Officer - Colonel
Officer - Colonel
Posts: 1383
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 4:27 am
Location: 1, USA, Ohio, in between Dayton and Cincy

Post by Quixote511 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:56 am

I am about the interior. For example with the B-25, I would want at least a detailed cockpit and bombbay. You need some interior details if you are doing a glass nose. And, if you are hanging it in a flying position, you might want to be able to have the bombbay doors open like she was going to lay the eggs.
Aaron

My pathetic fantasy football team:

[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/1804/polocksia2.jpg[/img][/url]

der Vogelfänger
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 770
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: 27th State

Post by der Vogelfänger » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:01 am

3T....yes, a detailed interior would be great, and worth the extra dollar outlay/investment (meine Frau would dispute the latter) as far as I'm concerned. I LOVE details. Picture a He-111 with all that glass AND having a super detailed "front office"!!! Man, oh man 8)

Good question and topic,

dV
du doch nicht!
Kennst du mich noch?
Luftwaffe-a-holic!!!

Unsere Mannschaft muß einfach gewinnen, und
plötzlich, Weltmeister Zwanzigvierzehn! (WM2014)

Danke Jungs!!

User avatar
toyktdlgh
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:19 am
Location: USA

Post by toyktdlgh » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:03 am

Yea, I’m about the interior too. On such an aircraft as the B-25 I would almost expect it. The flight deck, navigator’s areas and bomb bay should all be detailed out. The rest of the fuselage doesn’t have to be but those areas are important. I would want to be able to access them as well. I would pay extra for it but I think it can be done with minimal cost. It doesn’t have to be super detailed. If we wanted something like that we could add it ourselves later. Just the basics for a good look.

exether_mega
Officer - Colonel
Officer - Colonel
Posts: 1314
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:35 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by exether_mega » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:05 am

definitely yes :D

phil

tkjaer21
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 1042
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:18 pm
Location: Norman, OK

Post by tkjaer21 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:10 am

For the larger planes that people would go straight to and inspect in my 1:18 museum as I call it, then deffinately yes. The smaller ones I have noticed do not get looked over enough and just skimmed by.

VMF115
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 7112
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Clear Lake, South Dakota

Post by VMF115 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:54 am

Yes I would I also would like to see removable engine cowls.
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Let me hear your guns!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: My what?
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Your guns! Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: [fires his airplane's guns] AHHHH!

tkjaer21
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 1042
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:18 pm
Location: Norman, OK

Post by tkjaer21 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:57 am

I think after Jason from AT has seen and bought the Spitfire from Toy Fair, He may incorporate some of those things into their future work.

mountian-man
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Albany, NY

Post by mountian-man » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:10 am

The Devil is in the details.... :twisted: I think it is very important and a quality issue.

vmf214
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1581
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:23 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by vmf214 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:36 am

I think so too, interior is important. I also like the idea of removeable cowl panels, easy enough and shouldn't cost that much extra to provide being radials. Look at the 32x planes like the zero, darn nice engine but you can only see it from the front, I'm building one of the kits and it will have removeable cowling by the time I'm done with it.

Morian Miner
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1739
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:27 am
Location: 1, USA, AZ, Vail

Post by Morian Miner » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:56 am

I've said many times - leave out the interior if it drops the price. My biggest gripe was the detail of the BBi Zero interior that you can't even see on the assembled model. For something like the B25 that will be ceiling decoration for most, a detailed interior is like buying a car with 400 hp and can do 0-60 in 2 sec to go to the grocery store.
Sometimes, the mind needs a shovel, rather than a pencil and paper, to express itself.

immeww2
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3712
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:22 pm

Post by immeww2 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:04 am

Well if you go by 21st's motto "XD - EXTREME DETAIL", then I think a plane with a detailed interior is a must.

GooglyDoogly
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 5:59 pm

Post by GooglyDoogly » Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:38 pm

But Morian Miner does bring up a valid point. We as collectors always demand more details, yet I noticed many of us are unwilling or unable to pay for it.

As the 1/18 market evolved, these are becoming less of a toy, and more like display models with their details. Hence, the increased price range.

We really can't have it both ways. You either want these things cheap and toy-like, or want them detailed and be fairly expensive.

I myself don't care for the price one way or another. It all depends on the subject. I wouldn't pay 15.99 for a Starfighter, but I'm willing to fork over 140 for a Phantom II (more for a Phantom in Israeli colors!!!)

ARMY GROUP 1
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: australia

Post by ARMY GROUP 1 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:04 pm

I am not worried about the cost of the KT because all I need do is put $2 away each week & I will have money left over when its finally released, so you excited B25 fans can do the same & cost will not be a factor. Lets see Pak 40 halftrack announced August 06 @ $2 a week = until march 07 $64, yea more than enough, might even get two.

Moth
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:59 am
Location: 1, Brooklyn NY

Post by Moth » Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:29 pm

I have been wanting 2 versions of each plane since I started the hobby.
I just cant live with the fact that there are no opening engine covers!
Im even thinking of cutting up my Shmitts and Stangs to make my own engines :twisted:
[img39]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v501/QueenofSky/BirdFlu.gif[/img39] [img39]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Acherontia_lachesis.jpg/200px-Acherontia_lachesis.jpg[/img39]

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9678
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:54 pm

I for one am NOT interested in a detailed interier. Maybe a modest control panel and minor details. When the pilot is in the cockpit you really don't notice so why have it. Take the TIME and money spent on details and make another plane or tank. If it takes 2 or 3 years to make wings swing or fold back to heck with that noise . Make it simple stupid ,put more stuff out there. Get the outside right ( to scale) put a nice paint job on it and move on !!!!!!
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

tmanthegreat
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 11239
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Central California

Post by tmanthegreat » Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:51 pm

On an aircraft this big, I would expect that it have an interior and that at least the cockpit be well detailed. This is 21st Century Toys, afterall! Now, it doesn't have to be something super-detailed like those professional 1:18 models, but if it was something along the lines of the Avenger's level of detail, I would be happy.

On a "standard" B-25 with glazed nose, detail would be needed in the bombadier compartment, the cockpit and the area just behind, including the turret. The tail gun position would need to be detailed as well as the bomb bay interior. Most of the aft section rear of the bombay would not need that much detail. The glass window pieces over the cockpit and nose would need to be single pieces that are removable so that the interior can be better accessed (like how the canopy comes off on the Avenger). The turret glass and tail gun canopy would also need to be removable. The forward and rear entry hatches would have to open. Waistguns, if included, would need to swivel, as would the tail gun.

Again, I want and expect this plane to have a decent interior. I don't care if I can see all of it, I just like knowing it is there!
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."

KAMIKAZE
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2301
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:29 am
Location: 1, US, Tx, San Antonio

Post by KAMIKAZE » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:59 pm

Honestly I could take it either way. Mine almost certainly will be hanging from the ceiling with a Me-109 on it's tail. While detail is great, I really like the affordability of our hobby.

Mark
Last edited by KAMIKAZE on Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm a legend in my own mind.

User avatar
chunks
Officer - Colonel
Officer - Colonel
Posts: 1281
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:15 pm
Location: Fairbanks, AK

Post by chunks » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:05 pm

A detailed interior would be great with that greenhouse nose.
Tanks for the memories
Your breachblocks so black
And oodles of track
Here at Grafenwoehr it's so good to be back
Oh, tanks for the memories..

FieroDude
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1669
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:09 pm
Location: Sister Lakes, MI

Post by FieroDude » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:11 pm

Even though most of my birds hang from the ceiling, I still like a pretty decent level of interior detail for visible areas. On a B-25, especially with a glazed nose, this becomes a bit more important. At the same time, do we need every wire, switch and contour? No. But a plain blank panel would be kind of pointlesss too. And details that would not be visible from the exterior seem kind of pointless.
Verraten und verkauft,
zu lange vertröstet zu lange belogen
Verraten und verkauft,
Durch den Dreck und über den Tisch gezogen.
H.R.K 1993

VMF115
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 7112
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Clear Lake, South Dakota

Post by VMF115 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:42 pm

An aircraft as big as the 1:18 are you would expect a fair amount of detail with a bigger static model/toy. I hope to see greater detail in the cockpit, engine bays, removable cowls, gun lockers, and access panels. Do we need every switch in the cockpit to be there? …No I don’t. But I do think we need more detail, and I think the companies are trying to give that to us.
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Let me hear your guns!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: My what?
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Your guns! Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: [fires his airplane's guns] AHHHH!

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9678
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Sat Mar 03, 2007 6:18 am

All the extras take more time to develope. Every one would like a 1/18 Merlin or a BMW radial or Pratt and Whitney Wasp. Make those seperate. Offer them as add ons. Don't put them in the models . IT WILL SLOW DOWN PRODUCTION. Is a engine worth a 2 year delay NO !!
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

MightyMustang
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:20 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN

Post by MightyMustang » Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:26 am

To answer your question, yes I would pay for a detailed interior. I would like it even better if they had detailed engines like a Merlin or Pratt and Whitney. Thats one of the big things in my book that are missing from the 1/18th planes. I know BBI was going to have a detailed engine with the F6F where you could remove the engine cowl and so fourth but BBI scapped the idea due to cost. In some ways I can understand that. But to see a Mustang with a removable engine cowl to show a detailed Merlin or an F6F/Corsair with the same feature would have been sweet as hell. But thats just me anyway. I pretty much super detail my favorite planes anyway and stop at the engine because I cant get to them and cant find anyone who will make a 1/18th Merlin or Pratt and Whitney. That being said though I would pay for more detail.


:)
"You dont know the power of the darkside, it is your destiny" Lord Vader.

Moth
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:59 am
Location: 1, Brooklyn NY

Post by Moth » Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:08 am

"Is a engine worth a 2 year delay NO !!"

It is for me :wink:
[img39]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v501/QueenofSky/BirdFlu.gif[/img39] [img39]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Acherontia_lachesis.jpg/200px-Acherontia_lachesis.jpg[/img39]

sicqnus
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:32 am

Post by sicqnus » Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:52 am

I would pay for detailed interiors, engines and landing gears. No problem.
They should make the best aircrafts in two versions : retail and super-detailed for collectors. The super-detailed could be more expensive and limited editions, I'm sure they would sell well.

Post Reply