M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage Question?

Your Main Forum For Discussing 1:18 Scale Military Figures and Vehicles.
Post Reply
macvsog
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 8:16 am
Location: Boston & Santa Fe
Contact:

M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage Question?

Post by macvsog » Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:27 pm

Is the packaging for this different than the original M3A3 packaging? The same?

Does this version include the .50 caliber mount? Or has that entire piece of the vehicle been removed?

Mike

digger
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 4009
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:51 pm
Contact:

m16

Post by digger » Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:35 pm

Macvsog - good to see you around.
We don't know how it will be packaged but the forward M2 and ring mount have been removed according to the photos:
http://www.21stcenturytoys.com/area21/a ... newsID=189

macvsog
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 8:16 am
Location: Boston & Santa Fe
Contact:

Post by macvsog » Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:54 pm

Hey thanks digger.

I've always been around.

Just haven't been posting much at all.

You answered my questions perfectly. Weird though because I went looking for info on the 21st site and could find it. Guess I missed it.

Thanks again,

mike

JimBob55
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Missouri

M-16

Post by JimBob55 » Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:14 pm

I don't recollect that the production M16's had the ring mount. Some may have had a pintle mount at the cab, though.

The M16 quad-50 was usually paired with the similar M15 in air defense operations. The M15 had an armored turret which held a single 37mm gun with a pair of .50 cals. They were even complimentary in their front bumper equipment: the M16 had the winch and the M15 had the ditch roller. That way they could help each other traverse rough terrain. The quad-50 weapon system was very popular and appeared on towed trailers and was adapted for the Navy for shipboard use.

These AAA vehicles saw good use in air defense of Allied operations at the Ludendorf Bridge, 7-17 March 1945, as the Luftwaffe sent everything they could spare to try to knock out the bridge. Check out:
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/art/P-P/USAIA/remagen.htm

JimBob
<img src="http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/8874/akroncorsairud4.jpg" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us">

User avatar
aferguson
Lieutenant General - MOD
Lieutenant General - MOD
Posts: 13676
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:08 am

Post by aferguson » Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:29 pm

huh.....very interesting. I believe several sorties of Arado 234's were flown against the bridge, as well as Mistels and more conventional airstrikes as well. They were also considering using the piloted V-1 'semi-suicide' attack aircraft to fly into the bridges (with the pilot bailing out just before impact). The missions were vetoed by uncle Adolf though.
i never met an airplane i didn't like...

Threetoughtrucks
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 5405
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:46 am
Location: SOUTH JOISEY
Contact:

Post by Threetoughtrucks » Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:46 pm

Remember guys, that as WW2 progressed and the quad .50 cal showed how valuable a weapon it was, as triple A and also as anti-personel, a lot of different model half-tracks were converted to M-16.

The 1/1 half-track was like a big erector set, very easy to unbolt panels, floors and make changes.

My buddies half-track started life as a M3A1. The Army converted it to be used as a M-16. The vehicle was surplused in the 50's and the buyer threw away the bed sides and mounted a huge hook to the floor and the vehicle spent some time as a house mover in the Memphis area. My buddy bought it and converted it back to M3A1 over a number of years. It went full circle.

The White half-track is a great vehicle.

TTT
Sometimes I am the windshield, sometimes, I am the bug.

Teamski
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by Teamski » Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:10 pm

I believe that more M-15s were made than M-16s.....

-Ski
[url=http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2869983520050168193AYuxRR][img]http://inlinethumb18.webshots.com/8785/2869983520050168193S600x600Q85.jpg[/img][/url]

Threetoughtrucks
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 5405
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:46 am
Location: SOUTH JOISEY
Contact:

Post by Threetoughtrucks » Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:27 pm

Ski:

I believe you are mistaken. I'm gonna check it out.

TTT
Sometimes I am the windshield, sometimes, I am the bug.

Teamski
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by Teamski » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:28 pm

You do just that! Actually, I got that from the rarity value given to them in Squad Leader. You are probably right.....

-Ski
[url=http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2869983520050168193AYuxRR][img]http://inlinethumb18.webshots.com/8785/2869983520050168193S600x600Q85.jpg[/img][/url]

KAMIKAZE
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2301
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:29 am
Location: 1, US, Tx, San Antonio

Post by KAMIKAZE » Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:10 pm

The M-16 was more common. 8)
I'm a legend in my own mind.

Threetoughtrucks
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 5405
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:46 am
Location: SOUTH JOISEY
Contact:

Post by Threetoughtrucks » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:33 pm

Ski:

During WW2 there were 2,877 M-16 half-tracks made with the quad .50 cal mount

There were 680 M-15's made and 1,652 M-15A1's made. Both models of the M-15, had the 37mm quick firing AA gun with two ,50 cal (one on either side) in the mount.

The differences between the M-15 and the M-15A1 only deal with the size of the turret that held the guns. The M-15A1 slightly reduced the weight of the vehicle so the mechanics of the turret worked easier.

To confuse the issue a little, as the war progressed and unknown number of the 12,499 M-3 half-tracks t hat were made, were converted to a model M-16.

And, if that isn't confusing enough, an unknown number of M-15A1's took out the 37mm and inserted a 40mm quick firing Borfors gun. A few left the .50 cals but most of them only had the 40mm. The 40mm were mostly field mods in the PTO.

It means nothing but a hundred years ago, when I was in the market for a 1/1 half-track, I visited Memphis Auto Supply, in TN, a famous half- track surplus dealer, in the days, and their yard had about 150 half-tracks, all but one was an M-16 and all but about a dozen was an M-3 that had been converted to M-16. When were they converted? Who knows. Data plates on the vehicles would tell the story, but in those days I was only interested in converting one back to M-3A1. Even, in those days, it cost a fortune alone for four good quality deactivated, or replica .50cals, and a working quad mount..

Sorry for the delay in responding, but my half-track books got buried under 1/6 stuff in my bunker.

TTT
Sometimes I am the windshield, sometimes, I am the bug.

Teamski
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by Teamski » Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:44 pm

Thanks for the numbers! I stand officially corrected. I'll retreat back into my library now, hehehehe....

-Ski
[url=http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2869983520050168193AYuxRR][img]http://inlinethumb18.webshots.com/8785/2869983520050168193S600x600Q85.jpg[/img][/url]

Post Reply