Top Ten Bombers: Which would YOU like to see produced????

Your Main Forum For Discussing 1:18 Scale Military Figures and Vehicles.
User avatar
aferguson
Lieutenant General - MOD
Lieutenant General - MOD
Posts: 13677
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:08 am

Post by aferguson » Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:40 pm

that's been rumoured for a couple of years now...finally arrived did it.

Don't get too excited gang, it's a model kit and it will probably cost $500+ UNFINISHED.
i never met an airplane i didn't like...

digger
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 4009
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:51 pm
Contact:

yup

Post by digger » Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:12 pm

Aferg is right that with their history it will be pricey...
Cool though that it was at toyfair just last week.
Anyway it really goes to show what we got going in our 1:18 scale world. That nose is nice but at the same time looks like something bbi, 21st or AT is VERY capable of at $40 - $60, seriously.

eddie372
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 342
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 7:56 pm
Location: Miami Shores, Florida
Contact:

impossible?? Nahh

Post by eddie372 » Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:45 pm

I see the potential for the large bombers (B-17, B-25, B-24, etc.) becoming a valuable part of aviation museums, association headquarters (think AOPA, EAA), corporate offices (Piper, Cessna, Boeing, Martin), hobby shops, aviation schools and universities, movie studios and then, private collectors such as ourselves.

If you include foreign customers (British, French, German, etc.) the demand could be hugh for such unprecedented models. You just have to think outside the provervial 'envelope' and contemplate all the possibilities. Once this is done, develop the proper marketing and advertizing plan to fit your sales goal.

Dare to dream big, people!
Ed
The man that loves his job never works a day in his life.

CW4USARMY
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1859
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 4:32 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Post by CW4USARMY » Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:00 pm

Wow!!!! Those pictures of the belle cockpit are great. Unfortunately, it really puts the whole idea of a 1:18 bomber in proper perspective. It would be HUGE!!! I just dont see any way there will be enough mommys and daddys out there to buy a 1:18 bomber for little johnnie to enable the company to recoup what would be incredible tooling expenditures. Hec, parents wont even cough up 200.00 bucks for a remote control 1:9 scale Abrams that has more playability, has motors and electronics and takes up less space than a 1:18 bomber. And lets face it, there just isnt enough of us collectors to buy enough either. (look at the low poll counts)
I sure hope I am wrong but I just dont see this ever happening. :cry:

luftpanzer
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1528
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 5:55 pm
Location: Randolph New Jersey
Contact:

Post by luftpanzer » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:47 pm

Im still waiting for the rumored Bf 110
Back At ft campbell KY Formally of Ocala FL

tmanthegreat
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 11239
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Central California

Post by tmanthegreat » Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:06 pm

Though a 1:18 B-17 (or other large bomber) would be nice, outside of RC planes and film props, I just don't see one coming in its entirety as a feasable item of retail value. Smaller bombers such as the Mosquito, BF-110, TBM Avenger, and perhaps at a stretch, a B-25, are much more likely to be produced.

User avatar
aferguson
Lieutenant General - MOD
Lieutenant General - MOD
Posts: 13677
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:08 am

Post by aferguson » Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:34 pm

i never met an airplane i didn't like...

Emil Frand
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:41 am

Post by Emil Frand » Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:24 pm

B25G Gunship
B25H
B25J
He111H6
JU88
A20G Gunship
B17E ++NOT THE MEMPHIS BELLE PLEASE++
Mosquito MkVI F/B Version in D-Day Markings
He-219Ga (Twin Engine Night Fighter)
B5N2 Kate

Post Reply