http://page22.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/l91347449
The tiger p looks good, can't wait to add it to my collection.



DittoWrights Collectables wrote:Thanks for posting this Heer.
I like the look of the Tiger P.
I also like the new box art, lets remember not everyone is an experienced enthusiast, the box information will be useful to some.
Another great release from a manufacturer thats making a strong play for 1:72 manufacturer of the year in my opinion.
Didn't the fourth become the "Raumpanzer" prototype?AMERICAN_GRENADIER wrote:i have a book that says 4 were built but 3 had been converted to recovery vehicles
it doesnt say what happened to the 4th but Dragon says ~
This vehicle (chassis no. 150013) served as a command tank under the designation Panzerbefehlswagen VI(P). It fought in s.Pz.Jg.Abt.653 (schwere Heeres Panzerjager Abteilung 653) on the Eastern Front in early-to-mid 1944. The commander of the vehicle was Hauptmann Grillenberg, and it bore the turret number ‘003’.
I think American Grenadier meant that 4 porsche tigers were built, 3 were converted to recovery vehicles and the fourth porsche tiger was the 003 tiger, making the 003 porsche tiger the only porsche tiger to see actual combat service. So I guess we can all say that the posche tiger did indeed see wartime service.Wrights Collectables wrote:Didn't the fourth become the "Raumpanzer" prototype?AMERICAN_GRENADIER wrote:i have a book that says 4 were built but 3 had been converted to recovery vehicles
it doesnt say what happened to the 4th but Dragon says ~
This vehicle (chassis no. 150013) served as a command tank under the designation Panzerbefehlswagen VI(P). It fought in s.Pz.Jg.Abt.653 (schwere Heeres Panzerjager Abteilung 653) on the Eastern Front in early-to-mid 1944. The commander of the vehicle was Hauptmann Grillenberg, and it bore the turret number ‘003’.
As I remember 003 was the only tiger(p) to see active service on the Eastern front.
I too was somewhat dissapointed by dragon's tiger (p). It is extremely light. I understand the plastic, but the quality seems to be dropping on their tiger (p). I am hoping that this is soley due to the fact that this was a brand new casting. Weathering is also nonexistant.paulmerton wrote:
My only gripe is that several of the other latest releases are no longer screwed to the base of the display case. So if you're in the habit of leaving them in their original boxes, you can't really see them very clearly unless you remove the inner pieces of transparent plastic (which is the only thing stopping the model from rattling around).
Tiger P is an old tooling, back from 2006 or even earlier. I don't have one, but I am kinda surprised to hear that weathering and quality dropped. What do U mean by that? Is it detail wise?Heer wrote: I too was somewhat dissapointed by dragon's tiger (p). It is extremely light. I understand the plastic, but the quality seems to be dropping on their tiger (p). I am hoping that this is soley due to the fact that this was a brand new casting. Weathering is also nonexistant.
I thought this was the first time they've produced a ready made Tiger (P)? Or is it based on the same chassis tooling as the kit version?StormyThoughts wrote:Heer wrote:Tiger P is an old tooling, back from 2006 or even earlier.
The quality has indeed dropped a bit. It does not look as good as the production picture doesStormyThoughts wrote:Tiger P is an old tooling, back from 2006 or even earlier. I don't have one, but I am kinda surprised to hear that weathering and quality dropped. What do U mean by that? Is it detail wise?Heer wrote: I too was somewhat dissapointed by dragon's tiger (p). It is extremely light. I understand the plastic, but the quality seems to be dropping on their tiger (p). I am hoping that this is soley due to the fact that this was a brand new casting. Weathering is also nonexistant.
Recently I have picked up DAK 222. The weathering is quite extensive, and although I must admit they could put more detail on it, the new 223 has all the details that were missed on 222 (mirror guards, turning bayonets, visor guards and bored mg).
It is indeed. All Dragon Armor releases are ready made Dragon 1/72 Armor PRO kits. Usually the kit arrives first, followed shortly by pre-built version.paulmerton wrote: I thought this was the first time they've produced a ready made Tiger (P)? Or is it based on the same chassis tooling as the kit version?
Ah, I suspected that was the case. I think it may have been the better paint job on my Dragon pro kit that made me assume there was a difference, although I'm still not convinced that there's as much photoetched content in the Dragon Armor versions.StormyThoughts wrote:All Dragon Armor releases are ready made Dragon 1/72 Armor PRO kits. Usually the kit arrives first, followed shortly by pre-built version.
I have the first 3 in that list, all built and painted by a master pro (i.e. not me!). I'd be surprised to see the first one end up in the Dragon Armor range, as the bed spring armour is incredibly fragile and no doubt fiddly to assemble. It does look awesome thoughStormyThoughts wrote:Some Dragon 1/72 kits omitted in Dragon Armor range, I would like to see done:
T-34/85 with bed-spring armor, Berlin 1945 (Dragon 7270)
T-34 Mod 43 (Dragon 7277)
Sdkfz 251 with Wurfrahmen 40 "Stuka zu Fuss" (Dragon 7306)
Panther-BeobahtungWagen (Dragon 7230)
And You're right! Although these are Dragons ready made kits, they usually drop the photo-etched brasses were they canpaulmerton wrote:I'm still not convinced that there's as much photoetched content in the Dragon Armor versions.
You might get Your surprisepaulmerton wrote:I'd be surprised to see the first one end up in the Dragon Armor range, as the bed spring armour is incredibly fragile and no doubt fiddly to assemble. It does look awesome though
I'd really like one of those, but they seem to have sold out a long time agoStormyThoughts wrote:You might get Your surpriseRemember Dragon Armor 60311 - Chally2 with mesh armour? I was stunned when I saw they actually released it