![Image](http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l270/tkjaer21/DSCN1087.jpg)
The BGM-71 T.O.W. Launcher:
![Image](http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l270/tkjaer21/DSCN1079.jpg)
The XM307 A.C.S.W.:
![Image](http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l270/tkjaer21/DSCN1080.jpg)
The Mk. 19 40mm Grenade Launcher:
![Image](http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l270/tkjaer21/DSCN1082.jpg)
The M2 .50 Caliber Machine Gun:
![Image](http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l270/tkjaer21/DSCN1083.jpg)
M249 S.A.W.:
![Image](http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l270/tkjaer21/DSCN1086.jpg)
Trip T is right. No gun should go on this or any vehical with the red cross.Threetoughtrucks wrote:No gun at all is appropriate for any vehicle with a red cross on the side.
Is this vehicle based on a Ruskie APC?
Or is that a dumb question seeing it is G.I. Joe, anyway?
TTT
I agree. In traditional combat we are not allowed to mount weapons on medical vehicles. period.Threetoughtrucks wrote:The point is that "we" are a signer of the Geneva Convention and that is what we are supposed to abide by.
In WW2 the Japanese were NOT a signer but we were still required to treat them good and they could treat us the way they did. Our violations (killing prisoners, etc) did happen, in all theaters, but they were still violations
Today, ambulances do not carry guns. It just does not happen. If it did, the "left" would be all over our troops. Armored vehicles can be used, well marked and no offensive guns.
Hamas used ambulances to move around guns and suicide vests and they were caught by the IDF. Hamas complained to Geneva about the IDF stopping ambulances which were exempt from stoppages and Israel defended themselves in Geneva and won their case. Remember "offensive weapons" are not allowed.
I'm just making a point. Who cares what a Hasbro absurd out of scale toy has on it anyway.
Given the fact that "Who cares", mount the Ma Duece and move on to play with our toys..
TTT