FW Red 3 Question

Your Main Forum For Discussing 1:18 Scale Military Figures and Vehicles.
Post Reply
tankduel
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 1:39 am
Location: New Zealand

FW Red 3 Question

Post by tankduel » Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:39 pm

I read here somewhere that you should leave off the drop tank;that makes sense since this plane was for airfield defence,not long lange stuff.
My question is, should I take the bracket off too? Or leave it on.
Thanks
Neville

digger
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 4009
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:51 pm
Contact:

Off?

Post by digger » Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:04 am

I think that comes off as well.

The more I read about JV 44 the more I appreciate Red 3:)

http://rafiger.de/Homepage/FBMuseum/Inf ... eDoras.htm

You can also see that the nose panel in the 4 for Victory contest is right off the Red 3. :wink:

hworth18
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3567
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:58 am
Location: Tulsa,Oklahoma

Post by hworth18 » Mon Jun 20, 2005 6:32 am

Yes, The JV-44 Fw-190's would have NO need for the drop tanks since they were for short range defense only.. I would think you could either leave the rack on or off.. :wink:
“The moment you think you know what’s going on in a women’s head, is the moment your goose is well and truly cooked”
-Howard Stark

User avatar
aferguson
Lieutenant General - MOD
Lieutenant General - MOD
Posts: 13677
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:08 am

Post by aferguson » Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:02 pm

leave the rack off.....they wouldn't carry it unless they had had a drop tank on it, which they probably would not unless they wanted extra loiter time.

If you look at 21c's site even the red three in the '4 for victory' photo mauntauge doesn't have its tank or rack on.....nice attention to detail.

tankduel
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 1:39 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by tankduel » Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:40 pm

Thanks chaps! :D

INTREPER
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Southern CA
Contact:

Post by INTREPER » Wed Jun 22, 2005 8:38 am

Speaking of the FW, are the flaps and rutter supposed to be stiff? Looks like they should have some kind of movement. Or am I just seeing things? :shock:

tmanthegreat
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 11239
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Central California

Post by tmanthegreat » Wed Jun 22, 2005 8:41 am

The rudder should deffinitely move. As for the flaps, I think they can move as well, though they may be difficult to pull down. I haven't really ever dropped the flaps on my FW-190. Need to give that another try...

momaw nadon
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 777
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 3:07 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by momaw nadon » Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:37 pm

I have a question also. Was the antenna included with the Red 3? And if so, where was it located? I though some one said it was in the cockpit, but I'm not sure? Thanks for any help.
momaw nadon

digger
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 4009
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:51 pm
Contact:

On the joystick

Post by digger » Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:48 pm

On my S2 190 it was attached to the stick in the cockpit. Look there. :wink:

momaw nadon
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 777
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 3:07 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by momaw nadon » Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:49 pm

The round thing that is at the top of the stick is the antenna? If so, how do you get it out or off? Thanks
momaw nadon

vulgarvulture
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:05 pm

Post by vulgarvulture » Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:58 am

Razor or exacto knife. I had trouble with it, but it will come off eventually.

Teamski
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by Teamski » Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:02 am

INTREPER wrote:Speaking of the FW, are the flaps and rutter supposed to be stiff? Looks like they should have some kind of movement. Or am I just seeing things? :shock:
The problem with the flight controls on the FW-190 is that they are all tabbed, not hinged. So you will not get any sort of travel in them, unfortunately. This is slowly changing on every new release, though, so just about all of the new planes coming out have improved flight controls.

-Ski
[url=http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2869983520050168193AYuxRR][img]http://inlinethumb18.webshots.com/8785/2869983520050168193S600x600Q85.jpg[/img][/url]

INTREPER
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Southern CA
Contact:

Post by INTREPER » Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:05 am

Thanks for the info Teamski. That makes complete sense. OH well, I guess I won't be doing a RUN UP procedure with my FW :lol:

User avatar
aferguson
Lieutenant General - MOD
Lieutenant General - MOD
Posts: 13677
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:08 am

Post by aferguson » Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:27 am

you can display it in take off mode: hang it, with the flaps down about 15 degrees and the u/c partially retracted. I did that with one of my 190's and it looks pretty swish..

:D

Post Reply