Can we move the 1/18 aviation posts somewhere else?

Your Main Forum For Discussing 1:18 Scale Military Figures and Vehicles.
KAMIKAZE
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2301
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:29 am
Location: 1, US, Tx, San Antonio

Post by KAMIKAZE » Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:30 pm

Noooooooooo..........
I'm a legend in my own mind.

Threetoughtrucks
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 5405
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:46 am
Location: SOUTH JOISEY
Contact:

Post by Threetoughtrucks » Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:38 pm

If Dman can tell us he wants the board to devote all posts to figs and Tiger tanks? I demand the board devote all posts to 1/18 American half-tracks and quad .50 AA guns.

To me, that is a very reasonable demand....... heck, you can throw in a post about some new Sherman tank..... See how reasonable I am? :wink:

Really, anything but those figs, and endless German tanks.... :shock:

TTT
Sometimes I am the windshield, sometimes, I am the bug.

User avatar
DocTodd
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1146
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Central Texas
Contact:

Post by DocTodd » Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:46 pm

Yeah maybe all this military stuff is overrated. Toys and models are for the birds-I think I will just throw that junk away.
What in the heck is going on here? Who is this dandaman anyway? Perhaps we do need to isolate him. Let's start an intervention
T.

AlloySkull
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1564
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:34 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Post by AlloySkull » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:24 am

It's time for ther-rape-me

(What we called it in the looney bin!)

Intervention comes with a price...

That price is 10 cents for a latex glove.

The pain is on the house.

:lol:
[img]http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j317/alloyskull101/siggygpxd-1.gif[/img]
Good Traders:
KAMIKAZE
Ruger
Olifant
Panzer M

General Blasto
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 827
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:22 am
Location: Central Florida

Post by General Blasto » Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:50 am

Hmmm, guess an asbestos suit would be best to be worn on this thread :twisted: A quick bit of advice, if you don't want to read about a PLANE thread, then DON'T click on it ;) There's plenty of Armour threads to read up on. Check customs forum, LOTS of projects to view and perhaps try to build yourself - that'll keep ya busy, works for me 8) Da General

ostketten
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3240
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
Location: Washington DC area
Contact:

Post by ostketten » Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:37 am

smittyrob64 wrote:
ostketten wrote: Bottom line...the level of pinpoint bombing accuracy just was not like it is nowadays.
I wasn't aware of that. :D
In the fall of 1944, only seven per cent of all bombs dropped by the Eighth Air Force hit within 1,000ft of their aim point; even a fighter-bomber in a 40 degree dive releasing a bomb at 7,000 ft could have a circular error (CEP) of as much as 1,000 ft. It took 108 B-17 bombers, crewed by 1,080 airmen, dropping 648 bombs to guarantee a 96 per cent chance of getting just two hits inside a 400 by 500 ft area (a German power-generation plant.) Maybe this will help to better illustrate what I'm talking about. For reference purposes 1000 feet is roughly equal to one-fifth of a mile. :shock:
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"

smittyrob64
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: Abbotsford BC Canada

Post by smittyrob64 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:59 am

Thank you professor, :D I was kidding, obviously bombing accuracy is much better now then it was 64 years ago. Thank you for trying to dumb things down for me but I've heard these facts before, I read books too.

It was just a comment made about dropping a bomb on a tank, but thanks again for the history lesson :D :D
Last edited by smittyrob64 on Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

mikeg
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1692
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Atlanta Ga

.

Post by mikeg » Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:13 am

Hee, Hee..... e=mc2???????????/

ostketten
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3240
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
Location: Washington DC area
Contact:

Post by ostketten » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:07 am

but thanks again for the history lesson
No need to get your shorts in a bundle sonny, but you're welcome all the same. :roll:
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"

MG-42
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3583
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:42 am
Location: Pleasant Ridge , Ohio

* Can't we just move on here ?

Post by MG-42 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:42 am

* Can we just MOVE ON here ? * :D



Mitch v MG
" I love it , God help me ,.. I do love it so". * * * * PATTON * * * *



* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *

smittyrob64
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: Abbotsford BC Canada

Post by smittyrob64 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:45 am

My shorts are just fine, thank you for the advice. :P

dandaman
Officer - 1st Lieutenant
Officer - 1st Lieutenant
Posts: 594
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:00 pm
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth

New Aviation

Post by dandaman » Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:55 pm

I'm waiting for the new aero...the new jet...the new supersonic...er...um...OH WHO AM I KIDDING? I can't stand aviation. I can't even fake it.

normandy
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 6028
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 6:30 pm
Location: Atlantic Coast

Post by normandy » Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:11 pm

No one said you had to like aircraft/aviation :wink: Hell I'm an armor guy myself but its all got its place right here at Small Scale HQ.
8)

aae83
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: 1, USA, IL, St. Louis

Post by aae83 » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:53 pm

It wouldn't hurt my feelings if armor and aircraft were separated, and possibly even figures.

The approach I use to browsing what's new is to use the "View posts since last visit" link on the main page. As long as people put meaningful titles on the original postings (and stick to the theme of the thread!), it's easy enough to skip the ones you don't care to read.

Hope that helps!
aae83
Was it for this my life I sought? Maybe so, and maybe not...

Post Reply