New 1:32 Hartmann 109

Your forum dedicated to 1/32nd and smaller plastic and metal figures and vehicles.
Rowsdower
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 8043
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:33 pm
Location: Ocala, FL

Post by Rowsdower » Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:50 pm

I must say that I did like the Bravo Team WWII 1:18 figures a lot.

As for vehicles and planes, maybe newer vehicles like the Airacobra with more detail would translate better to plastic. However from the armor and Choppers I have seen it appears that they "beef up" the model with thicker plastic pieces and molded on parts to make it more kid friendly which is not good for us.
This message brought to you in part by Adderall.

hworth18
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3566
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:58 am
Location: Tulsa,Oklahoma

Post by hworth18 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:17 pm

Went by Target today and looked closely at the Mustang and Bf-109 that sat on the shelf. My opinion is that they are still bad, and even moreso in plastic. The P-51 was the better of the two in that it appears that the rivets aren't as pronounced as on the metal version, but it does still have the awful 2-piece spinner and very thick propblades that were obviously thickend so that kids could play with them and not be easily broken. The pilot looked like a morphed version of the 1/72 Me-262 pilot with the flightcap, full face airmask and goggles. The paint wasn't bad, but not up to even 21st's standards.
The Hartmann 109 was just bad, bad, bad, and bad....
The small details have obviously been made oversized to accomodate playtime with propblades that look more like 2x4 planks than propblades.
The paint was not represented well and the markings (especially the upper wing markings) were very inaccurate.

Sorry guys, not for me...... :(
“The moment you think you know what’s going on in a women’s head, is the moment your goose is well and truly cooked”
-Howard Stark

Rowsdower
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 8043
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:33 pm
Location: Ocala, FL

Post by Rowsdower » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:53 pm

hworth18 wrote:Sorry guys, not for me...... :(
Same here. :? :? :? :?
This message brought to you in part by Adderall.

ketelone
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1951
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:37 am
Location: Elmhurst, IL

Post by ketelone » Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:36 pm

Well, I finally found the BF-109 from Bravo Team. It took stopping at a lot of Targets. I really don't think it's that bad... It's definitely not the greatest but for $19.99....... I am disappointed it does not have a 'holder' as do the FOV planes but it's ok. My paint is good. The biggest drawback is the screws on the bottom of the aircraft. In light of the apparent extinction of 21st, I'll consider future releases. As far as the P51, ihave enough already. To me the P51 is as overdone as the King Tiger.....
Ketelone

"Freedom is not free."

tmanthegreat
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 11239
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Central California

Post by tmanthegreat » Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:04 am

I found this plane today :) There was one mixed in with a bunch of the 1:48 BT Blackhawks and I did get it. It certainly is not up to par with the 21c Bf-109G by any stretch of the word, but in my opinion is not the most terrible plane in the world - that goes to the Bravo Team P-51 :wink: I like the paint scheme on the '109 even if it does sport inaccuracies, and the elaborate gray patterns help to hide the terrible riveting. Plus, it is supposed to be Hartmann's plane!
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."

Post Reply