USAF smear campaign against A-10
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:28 am
- Location: Victoria,B.C. Canada
Re: USAF smear campaign against A-10
Does make you wonder about the USAF's agenda when it comes to the A-10?
Trying to free up funds for the F-35, at the cost of other programs. Wouldn't surprise me, but would be a mistake.
BTW, A-10's have just been sent to Germany, in response to further Ukraine fighting. Lots of life left in the venerable Warthog.
Trying to free up funds for the F-35, at the cost of other programs. Wouldn't surprise me, but would be a mistake.
BTW, A-10's have just been sent to Germany, in response to further Ukraine fighting. Lots of life left in the venerable Warthog.
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 4107
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:18 am
- Location: Albuquerque
Re: USAF smear campaign against A-10
They can't just give them to the Army because of a stupid rule made after WWII separating the forces.
They are ones who really need them and could loose lives when they are gone.
Remember the USAAF?
The Air Force can stick to their Nintendo warfare.
They are ones who really need them and could loose lives when they are gone.
Remember the USAAF?

The Air Force can stick to their Nintendo warfare.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>=}:
Good trader list: hworth18, Threetoughtrucks, mikeg, cjg746, jlspec
Good trader list: hworth18, Threetoughtrucks, mikeg, cjg746, jlspec
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:38 pm
- Location: Rapid City, SD
Re: USAF smear campaign against A-10
Sure is shameful how political it all is...Dauntless wrote:They can't just give them to the Army because of a stupid rule made after WWII separating the forces.
They are ones who really need them and could loose lives when they are gone.
Remember the USAAF?![]()
The Air Force can stick to their Nintendo warfare.
Nothing but an arbitrary "rule" saying the army cannot have combat jet aircraft, regardless of their intended use and purpose, is keeping them out of Army aviator's hands. Seems to me a mentality like that of a selfish child not wanting to share. There is very little actual and practical reasoning behind not giving the A-10 to the Army. We already share a great many facilities and utilize the same fuel types with existing rotary wing assets, and are the main customer of A-10 ground support.
I know it will never happen, but the idea of a Army infantryman, talking to and Army JTAC, who is in turn calling in a Army A-10, seems to me a much more practical way of doing things than the current method.
-Kevin