Page 1 of 1
For the 21c 1:144 fans...
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:43 pm
by tmanthegreat
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:54 pm
by hworth18
Cool!! More for my ever growing 1/144 fleet!!

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:07 pm
by Rowsdower
Very nice! 1:72 is the limit for me though!

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:21 pm
by olifant
Rowsdower, I just noticed your new signature. By "hockey-hair" do you mean a mullet? I have visions of skinny old Gretsky.
I just watched this comedian the other night which joked about mullets. I just about wet myself.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:10 pm
by VMF115

Don’t drop them on the floor, you will never find them again.

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:38 pm
by Rowsdower
olifant wrote:Rowsdower, I just noticed your new signature. By "hockey-hair" do you mean a mullet? I have visions of skinny old Gretsky.
I just watched this comedian the other night which joked about mullets. I just about wet myself.
Lol yeah mullet and hockey hair are pretty much the same. Seems to be coming back into fashion lately.
This is the man in question. I guess it's kind of an inside joke to Mystery Science Theater fans.

Ol' Zap is basically Canada's answer to Chuck Norris.
VMF115 wrote:
Don’t drop them on the floor, you will never find them again.


Each set comes with a pair of tweezers and a magnifying glass!
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:43 pm
by olifant
Lol yeah mullet and hockey hair are pretty much the same. Seems to be coming back into fashion lately.
This is the man in question. I guess it's kind of an inside joke to Mystery Science Theater fans. Ol' Zap is basically Canada's answer to Chuck Norris.
I was never a big Norris fan. On the subject of hockey I think Marty McSoryley could kick his @** any day of the week and twice on Sunday! Now there was a mullet to behold!
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:45 pm
by Rowsdower
olifant wrote: was never a big Norris fan. On the subject of hockey I think Marty McSoryley could kick his @** any day of the week and twice on Sunday! Now there was a mullet to behold!
Lol yeah those hockey players can kick some butt.

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:50 am
by ltcbj
The 21stC 144 aircraft appear to be much more detailed and far better made than their "New Millennium Classic Armor" tanks. Do the landing gear retract?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:51 am
by ltcbj
Do the planes have little pilots in them?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:27 am
by tmanthegreat
I would share your opinion on the aircraft detail being better than the tanks, however many of the tanks themselves aren't that bad either. The planes do not have little pilots, but do have a bare minimum of interior detail - namely the seats. Little details get hard to see when the scale is this small

The landing gear do not retract, though it would be cool to have two sets of landing gear, one in the retracted position and one in the extended.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:26 am
by ltcbj
As far as I can tell the tanks are useful primarily as gamer's items thanks to their relative cheapness. Many of those I have seen in Wal-Mart have been damaged right there in their little cases, guns bent or broken, turrets off, etc. The guns are usually very thin appearing too- the more so in contrast to say WTM or Dragon. Currently my W-M only has two 144 FW-190s, one of which has been pretty broken up but the packaging has been broken into so it is not as if it originally shipped that way- as so many of the tanks seem to.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 3:15 pm
by Jagdpanther
Great find Tman! Ill be looking out for it.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:30 pm
by kimtheredxd
Checked the silverdale WA TRU store no new 1/144th other than the pink p-40 set and the jagdtigers. I want a few of those dauntless planes!
.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:47 pm
by mikeg
pink p-40s?????? to go along with the pink spitfires???????? what about the pink 109s????????????
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:38 am
by ltcbj
The pink Me-109s, FW-190s & JU-87s all flew in support of the Pansy Divisions.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:16 am
by VMF115
ltcbj wrote:The pink Me-109s, FW-190s & JU-87s all flew in support of the Pansy Divisions.
It must have been this unit they supported.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jR9ZM6rI ... re=related
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:03 am
by ltcbj
Or was the object of their schwerepunkt....