Your forum dedicated to 1/32nd and smaller plastic and metal figures and vehicles.
-
MIGMADMAVIS
- Officer - Captain

- Posts: 764
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:45 pm
- Location: Granite Bay
-
Contact:
Post
by MIGMADMAVIS » Sat Feb 24, 2007 2:51 pm
Hi there, I dont know if this has been asked alreay, but the undercarriage bomb on the 32x stuka, is it to small???? I looked at the 1/18, and it is absolutely not the same size comparison??? Am I wrong?

Great Traders List:
hworth18
raiderad16
razor17019
momaw nadon
jmd250
kimtheredxd
-
tmanthegreat
- Officer - Brigadier General

- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Central California
Post
by tmanthegreat » Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:20 pm
It is smaller, but could easily be a lighter-weight bomb. It is still accurate!
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."
-
krieglok
- Officer - Captain

- Posts: 827
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 4:52 pm
- Location: North NJ
Post
by krieglok » Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:32 pm
T man is exactly correct. The Stuka carried two weight bombs. I always wondered why 21st went with the bigger bomb on the 1:18 version and the smaller bomb on the 1:32 version.
If you check out a place like Squadron, I think they may sell bomb "kits" and you could upsize the bomb on your 1:32 Stuka. The small bomb is correct but not as eye-catching as the bigger bomb.
TJ
-
aferguson
- Lieutenant General - MOD

- Posts: 13673
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:08 am
Post
by aferguson » Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:24 pm
however, the smaller bomb was more commonly carried than the bigger bomb. (500kg vs 1000kg).
But i still like the bigger one.

i never met an airplane i didn't like...
-
tkjaer21
- Officer - Major

- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:18 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
Post
by tkjaer21 » Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:00 am
The bigger one is more eye appealing by far. What was the difference in explosion power from the little and big one.