Nice models, probably first Shermans Mk. V (M4A4) made in 1/72 (I think all Aoshima's Shermans are of the "export" version Mk. V or Mk. Vc).
As always, I reacted enthusiastic to the Polish markings, but... the Firefly named "RYCERZ I" ("KNIGHT I" in English) was really a Mk. Ic (M4 with 17 pdr gun), not a Mk. Vc!
Well, the Polish 1st Armoured Division (France, Belgium, Holland, Germany) was equipped really in Mk. V Shermans, therein Mk. Vc Fireflies (then the "American" version: M4A1 (76) W) and Cromwells.
The 2nd Armoured Brigade (then Division), which fought on the Italian front as a part of the 2nd Polish Corps used mostly Shermans Mk. III (M4A2), but end 1944 got some Shermans Mk. Ib (105 mm howitzer), Mk. Ic and Mk. Ic Hybrid (both types with 17 pdr). In that time all tanks were painted in "European" OD (earlier, e.g. in the battle of Monte Cassino, they had still an "African" camouflage). In the 2nd Armoured Brigade/Division (but not in the 1st Division!) there was the practice of painting big individual names on the vehicles. One of them was the "RYCERZ I".
The not fitting of the painting to the right version of the tank or aircraft is not only the problem of Aoshima.
FoV made a British Sherman, a nice painted model, but the wrong M4A3 version (should be probably M4A2 = Mk. III). The FoV 1/32 Spitfire Mk. IX with invasion stripes from the Czech 310 Squadron should be probably a LF version (with "cut" wings) and have different (British) national signs (without white ring) on the top wings' surface. The 1/72 Hurricane: only the 87 Sq. black plane was really a Mk. IIc (with four 20 mm cannons). Corgi released a Polish Mustang Mk. III (P-51B) in 1/72 (Horbaczewski, 315 Sq.). The paint scheme is right
http://www.corgi.co.uk/CorgiSite/pages/ ... %5Ftest=1#, but the model depicts... a P-51D
http://www.monkeydepot.com/index.asp?Pa ... rodID=9698 never used by that Squadron (the only Polish unit equipped with Mustangs Mk. IV = P-51D/Ks was the 303. Squadron; the planes didn't have a camouflage).
Sorry for my complains. Generally, it is good (but could be better).
Wieslaw