So exactly what's wrong with the Lindberg 1/72 I-53?
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:44 am
I've been seriously tempted to get this model, but I've seen in much maligned on the internet. The bow is wrong, the conning tower is wrong and the kaitens are wrong.
So I've been doing my own research. The kaitens aren't wrong, but they represent a type that was never entered into service due to poor performance. The only one that was used was the type I, which is smaller and somewhat diff't looking from the type2/4 offered in the Lindberg kit.
The problem with the I-53 model itself is this, I think: The sub was initially named I-53. In 1942 it was renamed I-153 for whatever reason. I-153 was retired from combat duties and went on to become a training submarine. After it was retired from combat, I think there was another submarine commissioned that was called I-53. It went on to carry kaitens late in the war and in fact conducted one of the most successful missions with kaitens.
So I think the two subs were mixed up by whoever did the research for Lindberg when developing their I-53 model. The hull is correct but for the first I-53 (later named I-153) but not for the one that carried kaitens late in the war.
Where they got the shape for the conning tower from I don't know as it's wrong for I-153 and I-53 and in fact, I haven't found anything that shape yet......but Japanese submarines are a bit of a confusing mess to research.
If anyone has info to add to the above i'd love to hear it.
So I've been doing my own research. The kaitens aren't wrong, but they represent a type that was never entered into service due to poor performance. The only one that was used was the type I, which is smaller and somewhat diff't looking from the type2/4 offered in the Lindberg kit.
The problem with the I-53 model itself is this, I think: The sub was initially named I-53. In 1942 it was renamed I-153 for whatever reason. I-153 was retired from combat duties and went on to become a training submarine. After it was retired from combat, I think there was another submarine commissioned that was called I-53. It went on to carry kaitens late in the war and in fact conducted one of the most successful missions with kaitens.
So I think the two subs were mixed up by whoever did the research for Lindberg when developing their I-53 model. The hull is correct but for the first I-53 (later named I-153) but not for the one that carried kaitens late in the war.
Where they got the shape for the conning tower from I don't know as it's wrong for I-153 and I-53 and in fact, I haven't found anything that shape yet......but Japanese submarines are a bit of a confusing mess to research.
If anyone has info to add to the above i'd love to hear it.