Page 1 of 1
Warmaster 1/72
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:04 pm
by Tshintl
Re: Warmaster 1/72
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:41 pm
by jkinzel

Nice but no pilot,No pilot no buy.
Re: Warmaster 1/72
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:19 pm
by Gambit
OK, why is diecast52.com all over these pictures?
What's the point?
Re: Warmaster 1/72
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:52 pm
by Tshintl
Gambit wrote:OK, why is diecast52.com all over these pictures?
What's the point?
Websites do this to keep track of their pictures.
Re: Warmaster 1/72
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:01 am
by Epap
If these are examples of the actual models in this possibly forthcoming line, I'd have to say that they are definitely for the unsophisticated collector who knows very little about the planes they are supposed to depict. Like the IXO series, they use stick-on plastic parts rather than going to the trouble of drilling holes for wing guns and pitot heads, The markings are overly large in some cases and there are some pretty bad errors. The "Rufe" has a tail wheel and, I suspect, retracted main gear and its tail is wrong, which tells me that it is merely a regular Zero attached to floats.
The original Warmaster aircraft line was supposed to sell for $25 per model but that was then and this is now. I don't think that too many serious collectors will pay even that for a canon armed( ? ) F6F sporting such an ugly scheme or a tail sitting P-38 with those ridiculous IXO-style stick-on guns in its nose. Two plusses are the lack of black panel lines and the mottling on that MC-205, which is better than anything done by Corgi, Dragon or HM so far. To sum up, it looks like more fodder for bargain basement eBay sellers to unload on unsuspecting buyers----if there are any of the latter left to con.
Re: Warmaster 1/72
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 7:59 pm
by snake
Agree with Epap.
Looks to be a very "low budget" line.
The Rufe looks to be the best, but apparently has some issues as well.