21st P-40 Flying Tiger "RT Smith, 47" question?

Your forum dedicated to 1/32nd and smaller plastic and metal figures and vehicles.
Post Reply
dragon53
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 8785
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:56 pm
Location: Houston

21st P-40 Flying Tiger "RT Smith, 47" question?

Post by dragon53 » Fri May 30, 2008 12:51 pm

I have a question about thev 21st Century 1/32 P-40 "Flying Tiger" flown by RT Smith with #47 on the fuselage---Does this P-40 come with bombs, drop tanks, etc.?

Fox Tare-28
Officer - 1st Lieutenant
Officer - 1st Lieutenant
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario. STAY!

Re: 21st P-40 Flying Tiger "RT Smith, 47" question

Post by Fox Tare-28 » Fri May 30, 2008 5:19 pm

dragon53 wrote:I have a question about thev 21st Century 1/32 P-40 "Flying Tiger" flown by RT Smith with #47 on the fuselage---Does this P-40 come with bombs, drop tanks, etc.?
Not that I know of. The only extras I think it comes with are some stickers to correct the "neutered" Chinese nationalist markings on the wings. Vexillarius (sp?) decals have some better waterslide versions available at Badcat and Good Stuff to Go if you do not want to use the ones provided.

tmanthegreat
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 11238
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Central California

Post by tmanthegreat » Fri May 30, 2008 6:41 pm

As the plane replicates an earlier P-40B model (and a somewhat inaccurate one at that) it does not come with the extras like bombs and droptanks as I don't think the P-40B had provisions for those. As Fox Tare noted, it comes with the stickers for the Nationalist Chinese wing insignia. Essentially, the 32x P-40 is an exact scaled-down version of the 1:18 plane, including the same working features, oversized cockpit, and inacurate fuselage shape. That given, the RT Smith #47 P-40 is my favorite from the 32x P-40 series :wink:
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."

DropTank
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:39 am
Location: Texas

Post by DropTank » Sat May 31, 2008 4:02 am

Did anyone else get a 32 scale P-40 with the box labeled "warhawr" ?

dragon53
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 8785
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:56 pm
Location: Houston

Post by dragon53 » Sat May 31, 2008 8:39 am

TMANTHEGREAT:

Could you give me another one of your thorough reviews on the 1/32 RT Smith, #47 P-40---its pros and cons?...(I just ordered a used RT Smith #47 model from someone because of the history behind the real plane, but I'm not familiar with the details of the model itself).
Thanks.

(Also, last year during the Wal-Mart clearances, I saw 21st Century's 1/18 Pearl Harbor P-40---it's the least-detailed model I've ever seen. It reminded me of the Aurora models I saw in elementary school---a few seams and a few rivets---with lots of smooth skin. Even at $25, I thought it wasn't a good deal).

olifant
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2537
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:51 am
Location: 1, USA, Olympia, Washington

Post by olifant » Sat May 31, 2008 10:40 am

I am not Tman but the P-40 is my least favorite 1/32 AC I have. This is a really old model, think quality on par with the ME109E and original P51D. 21C just took the 1/18 release and down-scaled it to make the 1/32 bird. Detail is low, paint quality not as crisp but it does have working flaps. What I feel really detracts from the model is the fact that the canopy is very oversized. This was done to get it to fit over the cockpit and fuselage to slide on the rails. This makes it bulge out a good 3/16" on each size. At that scale it looks like it would protrude a good foot out on each side of the AC.

All that being said, it is the only 1/32 P40 on the market so it is worth getting at least one. Just don't expect it to take best in show. 8)
[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=375&i=sshqvdjx0.jpg][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.937d18e174.jpg[/img][/url]

hworth18
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3566
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:58 am
Location: Tulsa,Oklahoma

Post by hworth18 » Sat May 31, 2008 10:52 am

olifant wrote:I am not Tman but the P-40 is my least favorite 1/32 AC I have. This is a really old model, think quality on par with the ME109E and original P51D. 21C just took the 1/18 release and down-scaled it to make the 1/32 bird.
Oh Oli.. I am so disappointed........
The P-40 is nowhere near as bad as the P51 and 109E, but it does reflect the "second series" molds (P-47, Fw-190D9) that were not as good as todays releases, but much better than what we had seen.
“The moment you think you know what’s going on in a women’s head, is the moment your goose is well and truly cooked”
-Howard Stark

AlloySkull
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1564
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:34 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Post by AlloySkull » Sat May 31, 2008 11:39 am

It's not too bad. That cockpit canopy though is the deal killer. I have two P-40s in 1:32 and one in 1:18. It's not so bad in the larger, but in 1:32 it's obnoxious. I can deal with it. I actually put it higher than the P-47. :D My two P-47s aren't as great as my two P-40s. :)
[img]http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j317/alloyskull101/siggygpxd-1.gif[/img]
Good Traders:
KAMIKAZE
Ruger
Olifant
Panzer M

Rowsdower
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 8043
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:33 pm
Location: Ocala, FL

Post by Rowsdower » Sat May 31, 2008 12:08 pm

I love the P-40 IRL, especially the "E" or later, but I avoid the horrible 21st 1:32 P-40B like the plague. :evil:

Their Aleutian Tigers P-40E is much better though it is 1:48.
This message brought to you in part by Adderall.

tmanthegreat
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 11238
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Central California

Post by tmanthegreat » Sat May 31, 2008 10:09 pm

Yes, pretty much all about the model has been spoken for already, but I agree with Hworth18 that it is not that bad. The first series ME-109E, P-51D and even the ME-262 are far worse in terms of sculpting and detail. This is from the second series of 32x planes. The canopy and cockpit are too large and the fuselage has that "pregnant" look (as does the 1:18 version) but its not like excessively fat wings and oversized rivets... The paint apps are just fine to me, though don't expect any weathering. Again, the Chinese nationalist insignia are stickers due to political reasons. The stickers are of good quality, though, and have held up on mine three years on. You can easily find aftermarket decals, however. If you want the plane, I'd say go for it :D
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."

olifant
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2537
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:51 am
Location: 1, USA, Olympia, Washington

Post by olifant » Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:08 pm

hworth18 wrote:
olifant wrote:I am not Tman but the P-40 is my least favorite 1/32 AC I have. This is a really old model, think quality on par with the ME109E and original P51D. 21C just took the 1/18 release and down-scaled it to make the 1/32 bird.
Oh Oli.. I am so disappointed........
The P-40 is nowhere near as bad as the P51 and 109E, but it does reflect the "second series" molds (P-47, Fw-190D9) that were not as good as todays releases, but much better than what we had seen.
:shock: Usually your taste is impeccable, but this is the scale equivalent of seeing you in Hawaiian shirt, white shorts and black sox! :P

I figure to each their own, but this plane really needs to be redone. If the canopy wasn't so huge I would move the 'Hawk up in the like department but I just cannot overcome my bias. Hence its place of shame at the far rear of my hanging collection.
[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=375&i=sshqvdjx0.jpg][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.937d18e174.jpg[/img][/url]

RAD 2112
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:59 am
Location: New Jersey

Post by RAD 2112 » Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:13 pm

Having at least one of everything, I think the P-40 is my least favorite of the 32x.
Not only that, but it's the heaviest out of the bunch... probably from all of the screws that are needed to put it together.

But back to your question...
Drop tanks and bomb shackles weren't introduced until the P-40C.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-40
There is no security in this life. There is only opportunity.
- Gen Douglas MacArthur

Safe Trader List:
Black Lion VF-213, hworth18, KWR190, nooker 21, Olifant, Tmanthegreat, Trigger1, V2 MAN, vulgarvulture, Coreyeagle48

Post Reply