Jeez, and you said I get flustered.. You're arguing this thing to death!!!!
The "ACCEPTED" idea is that this thing was a Demolition Tiger, so take it at that and LET IT GO....
Review of the Last 8 Dragon Armor Releases
-
hworth18
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:58 am
- Location: Tulsa,Oklahoma
Lightning,
Jeez, and you said I get flustered.. You're arguing this thing to death!!!!
The "ACCEPTED" idea is that this thing was a Demolition Tiger, so take it at that and LET IT GO....
Jeez, and you said I get flustered.. You're arguing this thing to death!!!!
The "ACCEPTED" idea is that this thing was a Demolition Tiger, so take it at that and LET IT GO....
“The moment you think you know what’s going on in a women’s head, is the moment your goose is well and truly cooked”
-Howard Stark
-Howard Stark
-
lightning2000
- Officer - Major
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:31 am
- Location: New York City
- Contact:
Bergetiger
Harry,
I'm not getting flustered even though you'd like to believe otherwise. You say it is now accepted that it was a demolition Tiger and I think otherwise based upon facts, not conjecture. What exactly are they demolishing, hmm? A pillbox facing in the wrong direction? A bridge that could just as easily be destroyed by engineers emplacing mines along the supports?
Harry, just because a couple of guys that you probably look up to are telling you one thing doesn't mean that their argument holds an ounce of water. I've presented my argument and you haven't said boo about any of it. All you're telling me is that this thing was designed to blow things up. What its supposed to blow up and how its supposed to do it is never discussed. Just this is "accepted" by a bunch of guys huddled around their computers based upon one sideview photograph.
You interested in a 100 year old bridge too?
Lightning2000
www.themotorpool.bigstep.com
I'm not getting flustered even though you'd like to believe otherwise. You say it is now accepted that it was a demolition Tiger and I think otherwise based upon facts, not conjecture. What exactly are they demolishing, hmm? A pillbox facing in the wrong direction? A bridge that could just as easily be destroyed by engineers emplacing mines along the supports?
Harry, just because a couple of guys that you probably look up to are telling you one thing doesn't mean that their argument holds an ounce of water. I've presented my argument and you haven't said boo about any of it. All you're telling me is that this thing was designed to blow things up. What its supposed to blow up and how its supposed to do it is never discussed. Just this is "accepted" by a bunch of guys huddled around their computers based upon one sideview photograph.
You interested in a 100 year old bridge too?
Lightning2000
www.themotorpool.bigstep.com
Create Your Own Battlefield in Miniature or Build Your Own Private War Museum...The Choice is Yours at The Motor Pool!
Holy Cow. Can we discuss this extremely minor issue WITHOUT the childish banter thrown in??
Lightning: your always welcome to state your opinions, just like anyone else but almost each and every post you've made has had some little dig thrown at the people who are taking the viewpoint differing from yours. There is no need to be so beligerant. I've been pretty patient up til now but i've had enough.
Discuss objectively or don't discuss at all.
This thread is closed.
Lightning: your always welcome to state your opinions, just like anyone else but almost each and every post you've made has had some little dig thrown at the people who are taking the viewpoint differing from yours. There is no need to be so beligerant. I've been pretty patient up til now but i've had enough.
Discuss objectively or don't discuss at all.
This thread is closed.