1/18 Scale M4A1 Hull Redo After 7 Years !!

Your Main Forum For Discussing 1:18 Scale Military Figures and Vehicles.
pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9638
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

1/18 Scale M4A1 Hull Redo After 7 Years !!

Post by pickelhaube » Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:47 am

Hey Guys,

I hope to get started on the M4a1 hull today. Hopefully I will have some pics to post tonight.

For you guys who are actually going to get this I have a question.

Do I texture the hull or not? The 21st has no texture what so ever ( it is smooth ) and the FOV turret is WAY TOO ROUGH.

So Do I leave it smooth , fine texture or semi rough texture it ?

No way will I do it as rough as the FOV. That should be sanded a bit to get it looking half way decent.

My other post started to head in a different direction so I made a new post.

Input welcomed. :wink: :D :D :D
Last edited by pickelhaube on Mon May 29, 2017 7:14 am, edited 12 times in total.
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

grockwood
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 984
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO.

Post by grockwood » Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:59 am

The M4A1 is a cast hull and has a definite textured appearance. The 21st XD M4 hull version is made from rolled steel plates welded together. Thus a more smooth finish. I vote for a fine texture.

flyboy_fx
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 4336
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:42 pm
Location: North Carolina,USA

Post by flyboy_fx » Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:14 pm

I just did a thicker cast texture on mine to cover up the seams (too lazy to sand and what not) I may refine it a bit as it is a little to thick but it is still technically overdone.. :? :D and im going to cover most of the tank with gear lol to hide imperfections. :wink:
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better."
--Samuel Beckett

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9638
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:43 pm

I started a little experamentation getting the radia on the side and with the texture.
I think that I got it right and it is just rough enough.
It is about half as rough as the FOV.
What do you guys think ?

Image
Image
Image
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

grockwood
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 984
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO.

Post by grockwood » Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:23 pm

Looks about right to me.

Panther F
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:56 am
Location: Indiana

Post by Panther F » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:10 am

Looks good! Much better than a smooth surface.


- Jeff

1958Zelda
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 1:01 pm
Location: SPOKANE, WA

Post by 1958Zelda » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:39 am

Looks Great

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9638
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:04 pm

I finally got the prototype done.

That resin just killed me.

Check the pics out.

Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

User avatar
grunt1
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2978
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:41 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Post by grunt1 » Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:21 pm

Very cool... what was the final price and do you take howitzers in trade? ;)

User avatar
aferguson
Lieutenant General - MOD
Lieutenant General - MOD
Posts: 13632
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:08 am

Post by aferguson » Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:34 pm

outstanding, pH. Like i said, you are a magic wand.
i never met an airplane i didn't like...

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9638
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:36 pm

Hey Grunt we can work something out :wink:

I was thinking about $85 for the hull. It is one unit and fits on the 21st chassy with no problem.

All you need to do is pop off all of the hardware. Lights brackets shovels that kind of thing off of the mother Sherman.

I have not done the FOV retro fit yet. I am going to see what kind of response that I get with the first prototype.

I was thinking of doing a parts package for about $25 which will include everything you need so you will not have to take them off of the 21st hull.

That way you could keep the 21st hull and just switch them out and have 2 tanks for the one .
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

grockwood
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 984
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO.

Post by grockwood » Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:31 pm

That .hull is looking very nice.

Fritzkrieg
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 835
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:49 pm

Post by Fritzkrieg » Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:39 pm

A parts package would be a great idea :D

fightin
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 12:05 am
Location: near Vienna, Austria

Post by fightin » Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:47 pm

wow, looks real cool! Great job!
We still need more new 1/18 aircraft!

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9638
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:37 am

Thanks Guys ,

I will try to get the hull all tweaked out today. Filler caps that kind of stuff.

I am thinking of cutting off the beam thing that goes across the front for gear stowage.

I do not recall too many pics with this on in pics. The ones that I have seen are mounted up closer to the hull anyway.

It will be easier to cast WITHOUT IT.

So should I leave it or cut it ?
Last edited by pickelhaube on Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

1958Zelda
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 1:01 pm
Location: SPOKANE, WA

Post by 1958Zelda » Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:44 am

Cut it!

normandy
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 6028
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 6:30 pm
Location: Atlantic Coast

Post by normandy » Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:48 am

Make it easy on your self, cut it. This hull looks great!

rschaap
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:20 am

Sherman

Post by rschaap » Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:28 am

I say cut it. I agree, make things easier on yourself. I also think it looks a lot better without it. As an option you can always include the piece if someone wants it. Keep up the great work.

exether_mega
Officer - Colonel
Officer - Colonel
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:35 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by exether_mega » Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:55 am

Cut it !

phil

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9638
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:11 pm

Well I took everyones input and cut it off.

I think it looks better.

I fit the hull to the FOV and it was not as hard as I thought. I had a little practice with the M-10 and it was not hard to do at all.

What I did was make it like the 21st and cut the tranny off and made it a seperate piece. Here it is.

Image
Image
Image

I mounted all the fuel caps and did a mockup.

This is almost ready to mould . All I need to do is put the mounting stubs in for the FOV and we are ready to go.

Image
Image
Image

So you can now use either the 21st or FOV to do this mod.

I will make the FOV tranny seperate I am guessing about $10- $15.

All you will have to do is unscrew the old hull and screw mine on and the mod is done.

That is after a little sanding of flash priming . You will probably need to get the parts kit for the FOV because it will be real hard to use the parts because they are moulded to the hull.

But it can be done.
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

PLASTICFANATIC
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:34 pm

Post by PLASTICFANATIC » Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:48 pm

This look realy great!!....well, ALL of your custom jobs look great!!!!!

binder001
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:35 am

Post by binder001 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:58 am

I only visit the 1:18 side occasionally and came across this - it looks GREAT! I am a major Sherman buff and this one is really tempting. Your tesxture looks good, the real casting vary in roughness (there were several foundries producing the parts) but in general US armor castings are not nearly so rough as the Russians, etc.

So far it looks like the "best" M4A1 would be your upper hull on the 21C lower hull for the correct rear engine plate (the FoV is a Ford-engined M4A3), with a 21C turret and FoV suspension bogies (21C have the later raised return roller bracket).

By the way, you are right to leave the "stowage beam" off. There was a small fender support bracket on real Shermans. The crews would often place a timber, board, or steel beam across the front that was held in place by those fender supports. There wasn't a standard design and not everyone used the front stowage support.

Nice work - I'll have to look into this.

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9638
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:38 am

binder001 wrote:I only visit the 1:18 side occasionally and came across this - it looks GREAT! I am a major Sherman buff and this one is really tempting. Your tesxture looks good, the real casting vary in roughness (there were several foundries producing the parts) but in general US armor castings are not nearly so rough as the Russians, etc.

So far it looks like the "best" M4A1 would be your upper hull on the 21C lower hull for the correct rear engine plate (the FoV is a Ford-engined M4A3), with a 21C turret and FoV suspension bogies (21C have the later raised return roller bracket).

By the way, you are right to leave the "stowage beam" off. There was a small fender support bracket on real Shermans. The crews would often place a timber, board, or steel beam across the front that was held in place by those fender supports. There wasn't a standard design and not everyone used the front stowage support.

Nice work - I'll have to look into this.
Hello ,

Thanks for the compliment.

I have made a generic M4A1. Something you can work with.

The first M4A1 had the rollers you talked about ( just like on the M-3 Grant ) and tiny mantlet. They also had the slick pads on the tracks .
I think they progressed them as they built them.

The 21st could be used for that version but it should not have the ring around the bow gun. Easily sanded off. Also it probably should not have the armor plate on the stock 21st turret.

The M4A1 hull is correct for the FOV . The grille in back is not an issue because with my replacement the FOV upper hull is not even used.This would be the late M4A1 version. Additional armor should be on the turret and aditional armor should be on the hull sides. Also the extra hatch on the top of the FOV should be deleated.

As stated before this is a generic M4A1 hull . With minor changes either way will work with what is out there. Or use as is for a easy conversion.

During the war they used eveything that was moving. Different tracks turrets and what not. If it fit use it.


The next phase of the M4A1 would be the 76 gun and it would have canted hull hatches. I am pretty sure I will not do that version. It all depends how this one sells.
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

Post Reply