BadCat's Opinion on 1:18 Subjects
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:02 pm
Interesting observations (vs what JSI is considering):
http://www.talesofthecat.com/journal/20 ... jects.html
It's an interesting time in 1:18 scale right now. We have new projects on the horizon but this is the first time in several years the 'Cat doesn't have any 1:18 irons in the Fire. JSI hasn't responded to any of my unsolicited input. BBI will make anything you want as long as you order 3000 pieces or more. Admiral is AWOL. Pegasus has shown much interest of late. And 21st Century is taking a dirt nap.
I may have a different perspective than some of the readers of this blog. Sure, I want the consumer to get what they want, satisfying demand is job #1. If something gets produced and it doesn't sell . . . end of story. Clearance sales are bad, bad news for any scale in any hobby. Internet braggers once gloated and pontificated on the sweet $10 deal they roped on a TBM at Walmart, without realizing that they were simply gathering-up the burnt remains of their hobby. In our hobby, clearance sales are like road kill, free meat but no more animal.
So, I also add a few constraints that favor the supply chain such as small size, low production costs, and a minimization of risk--all important factors that don't normally enter into the endless Internet debates amoung collectors. In the end, the product must sell and there must be profits otherwise nothing gets made. It's not enough to make something then sell it, there has to be some serious money to be made, otherwise the equation falls apart. So, since we're not involved in any projects presently and not holding onto any secrets, here is my Top 5 1:18 scale candidates and why:
1. Me-163--In 1:18 scale, this popular model would be simple, small, available in numerous schemes and very, very popular. Nothing but up-side here. No big props to break (that little generator prop doesn't count). The landing gear is a removable trolley. The wingspan would only be 20 inches. Numerous MRC Easy Model 1:72 schemes all sold well. Its German, and in the military toy business, German sells. All available in a package that would probably retail for less than $50. Elementary, my dear Watson, elementary. In light of this, why are $200+ Su-27s even being considered? Come on manufacturers, wise up, stop reaching, get smart and make this plane.
2 F4F Wildcat--Another diminutive aircraft that can economically manufactured, packaged tightly, painted many different schemes, and sold to everyone! Complexity of the landing gear is the only bugaboo but the 1:32 BBI Wildcat shows this is a non-issue. Previous sales of this plane in other scales are solid but not spectacular.
3. Spitfire IX-- The original Mk I birds by 21st came, went, and fetch great prices on the aftermarket. The pinnacle of all Spits, the mark nine, can be fitted with D-Day stripes and could be ready to adorn collections worldwide. Moderate tooling costs and complexity. This airframe has a solid track record both in 1:18 and other scales. Make a nice plane and it's hard to get hurt here.
4. F4--I've changed my mind on this one. Two false starts already for the Phantom but this plane would sell well and would have many, many really good paint schemes possible including the JR, Viet Camo, TBirds, and Blue Angels, just to name a few. Very high production costs and huge risk but the strong F-14 sales suggest that the F-4 is a gamble worth taking.
5. Piper Cub--Don't laugh. General Aviation seldom does well in other scales because people want to buy a Cessna 172 that looks like the one they own(ed), not somebody else's. Entire the Cub. They are all yellow with a black lightning stripe! These will outsell the GB Racer released by Pegasus and the GB was no slouch in the sales department. On top of this, a military liason scheme could also be produced. Another cheap, small, simple, low risk type of project.
Using the perspective of making something that would benefit both the industry and collectors as group, thus furthering the hobby, and not necessarily what looks best hanging from an individual collector's ceiling, do you Agree or Disagree?
http://www.talesofthecat.com/journal/20 ... jects.html
It's an interesting time in 1:18 scale right now. We have new projects on the horizon but this is the first time in several years the 'Cat doesn't have any 1:18 irons in the Fire. JSI hasn't responded to any of my unsolicited input. BBI will make anything you want as long as you order 3000 pieces or more. Admiral is AWOL. Pegasus has shown much interest of late. And 21st Century is taking a dirt nap.
I may have a different perspective than some of the readers of this blog. Sure, I want the consumer to get what they want, satisfying demand is job #1. If something gets produced and it doesn't sell . . . end of story. Clearance sales are bad, bad news for any scale in any hobby. Internet braggers once gloated and pontificated on the sweet $10 deal they roped on a TBM at Walmart, without realizing that they were simply gathering-up the burnt remains of their hobby. In our hobby, clearance sales are like road kill, free meat but no more animal.
So, I also add a few constraints that favor the supply chain such as small size, low production costs, and a minimization of risk--all important factors that don't normally enter into the endless Internet debates amoung collectors. In the end, the product must sell and there must be profits otherwise nothing gets made. It's not enough to make something then sell it, there has to be some serious money to be made, otherwise the equation falls apart. So, since we're not involved in any projects presently and not holding onto any secrets, here is my Top 5 1:18 scale candidates and why:
1. Me-163--In 1:18 scale, this popular model would be simple, small, available in numerous schemes and very, very popular. Nothing but up-side here. No big props to break (that little generator prop doesn't count). The landing gear is a removable trolley. The wingspan would only be 20 inches. Numerous MRC Easy Model 1:72 schemes all sold well. Its German, and in the military toy business, German sells. All available in a package that would probably retail for less than $50. Elementary, my dear Watson, elementary. In light of this, why are $200+ Su-27s even being considered? Come on manufacturers, wise up, stop reaching, get smart and make this plane.
2 F4F Wildcat--Another diminutive aircraft that can economically manufactured, packaged tightly, painted many different schemes, and sold to everyone! Complexity of the landing gear is the only bugaboo but the 1:32 BBI Wildcat shows this is a non-issue. Previous sales of this plane in other scales are solid but not spectacular.
3. Spitfire IX-- The original Mk I birds by 21st came, went, and fetch great prices on the aftermarket. The pinnacle of all Spits, the mark nine, can be fitted with D-Day stripes and could be ready to adorn collections worldwide. Moderate tooling costs and complexity. This airframe has a solid track record both in 1:18 and other scales. Make a nice plane and it's hard to get hurt here.
4. F4--I've changed my mind on this one. Two false starts already for the Phantom but this plane would sell well and would have many, many really good paint schemes possible including the JR, Viet Camo, TBirds, and Blue Angels, just to name a few. Very high production costs and huge risk but the strong F-14 sales suggest that the F-4 is a gamble worth taking.
5. Piper Cub--Don't laugh. General Aviation seldom does well in other scales because people want to buy a Cessna 172 that looks like the one they own(ed), not somebody else's. Entire the Cub. They are all yellow with a black lightning stripe! These will outsell the GB Racer released by Pegasus and the GB was no slouch in the sales department. On top of this, a military liason scheme could also be produced. Another cheap, small, simple, low risk type of project.
Using the perspective of making something that would benefit both the industry and collectors as group, thus furthering the hobby, and not necessarily what looks best hanging from an individual collector's ceiling, do you Agree or Disagree?