Switch to 1/16 or stay with 1/18 armour?
Switch to 1/16 or stay with 1/18 armour?
With recent events looking pretty gloomy for 21c and the sputtering releases for 1/18 armour over the years, there has been some talk recently of people switching to collecting 1/16 armour. So i'm curious as to how many are seriously thinking about it, have done it, would never do it etc.
Hence this poll.
Hence this poll.
i never met an airplane i didn't like...
-
- Officer - Colonel
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:35 am
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:51 am
- Location: 1, USA, Olympia, Washington
I'm considering it for armor not available in 1/18 like a KT or Stug. I wouldn't want to mix Shermans, Tigers, Panthers or the like 1/16 with 1/18.
[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=375&i=sshqvdjx0.jpg][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.937d18e174.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=375&i=sshqvdjx0.jpg][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.937d18e174.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3583
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:42 am
- Location: Pleasant Ridge , Ohio
1/16th. ( ? )
[+] > Already have. Liked them for a couple of years now. *
* So go ahead and SWITCH ,.. or do what I do ,.. mix & match. What could it really hurt ?
* "It's no BIG freakin' deal". Except the figures and AC ofcourse. *
Mitch v MG
* So go ahead and SWITCH ,.. or do what I do ,.. mix & match. What could it really hurt ?
* "It's no BIG freakin' deal". Except the figures and AC ofcourse. *
Mitch v MG
" I love it , God help me ,.. I do love it so". * * * * PATTON * * * *
* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *
* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 7112
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Clear Lake, South Dakota
Check out this threadtosborne3 wrote:I like the 1/16th stuff, but WOW, it's way to expensive for my wallet.
viewtopic.php?t=13364
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Let me hear your guns!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: My what?
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Your guns! Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: [fires his airplane's guns] AHHHH!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: My what?
Colonel "Madman" Maddox: Your guns! Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack!
Captain Wild Bill Kelso: [fires his airplane's guns] AHHHH!
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3583
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:42 am
- Location: Pleasant Ridge , Ohio
1/16th. ( ? )
* "Pimp out your wife or girlfriend".
Mitch v MG
Mitch v MG
" I love it , God help me ,.. I do love it so". * * * * PATTON * * * *
* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *
* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
- Location: Washington DC area
- Contact:
I'm not going to completely give up collecting XD armor, and I'll almost certainly pick up the 88mm when it comes, and maybe the KT as well, but for me the 1/16 RC armor has added a whole new dimension to my hobby, and a very diverse and satisfying one at that.
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
- Location: Washington DC area
- Contact:
Pimp my tank eh...??? LOL Actually, I think somebody at RCU once posted pics of a 1/16th Panther or something that they painted hot pink... complete with a little Pink Panther commander figure...LOL...cute, but honestly... I don't think I would ever do it..Pimping... Maybey I can paint my XD tiger1 purple
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Central California
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:09 pm
- Location: Sister Lakes, MI
I will probably mix and match--I already do, anyway, with a 1/16 RC Pershing that I have had for a couple years. As far as I am concerned, if it's a subject I really want and it's not out of my price range (which is why I don't have a 1/6 Tiger under glass as a coffee table), I will get it, regardless of scale. Ideally in a scale I already collect, or at close enough, but hell, I broke down and bought the FOV 1/32 Jagdpanther because it was the largest version I could find in my price range (and almost as expensive as an XD version would run, if I recall correctly).
Verraten und verkauft,
zu lange vertröstet zu lange belogen
Verraten und verkauft,
Durch den Dreck und über den Tisch gezogen.
H.R.K 1993
zu lange vertröstet zu lange belogen
Verraten und verkauft,
Durch den Dreck und über den Tisch gezogen.
H.R.K 1993
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
- Location: New Orleans
I have 3 FOV King Tigers and 1 Wittman tiger with a T-34/85 thrown in. All 1/16 scale. That is roughly about $1485 worth of stuff. The avarage price of 1/18 is about $60 to $120 now. So my money will be on 1/18 stuff. I think that I will pass on the new 1/16 FOV Sherman. I can't see paying that much for a Shermy. Most of the 1/16 stuff out now you have to build. Isn't that the allure of 1/18 scale ? You don't have to build it.
-
- Officer - Lt. Colonel
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 5:59 pm
Actually, most of the the 1/16th tanks now are RC, and pre-painted and pre-built. The price ranges from $70-$150. The only difference between the pricier ones and the cheaper ones is that the pricier ones comes with better eletronics and/or metal tracks.
But if you just want a static model and don't particularly into the RC aspect of the hobby, then those cheaper ones are good buys.
Although the pricier Tamiya kits, you still have to build.
But if you just want a static model and don't particularly into the RC aspect of the hobby, then those cheaper ones are good buys.
Although the pricier Tamiya kits, you still have to build.
-
- Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:50 pm
- Location: Abbotsford BC Canada
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 4107
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:18 am
- Location: Albuquerque
Most everything I have is 1:18, and have collected this scale for years. Whether it's Gi Joe, Star Wars, Ultimate Soldier or BBI. I can't change now and expect to even come close to the amount of toys in this scale.
I have strayed into the 1:32 arena because it's the next prolific for aircraft and armor, and is probably the future of most of the 21'st, BBI offerings.
I have strayed into the 1:32 arena because it's the next prolific for aircraft and armor, and is probably the future of most of the 21'st, BBI offerings.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>=}:
Good trader list: hworth18, Threetoughtrucks, mikeg, cjg746, jlspec
Good trader list: hworth18, Threetoughtrucks, mikeg, cjg746, jlspec
-
- Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: australia
slipping
The range of 1/16 tanks seems to be expanding quickly and I am starting to make my 1/18 figures seemingly ok against them, which they are not quite. I realized along time ago to bring my 1/18 vehicles alive you need the figures all over them, so I am trying to convince myself they fit in with 1/16, which means I will start to collect them, but no longer as a army builder due to the size. Stricting one of each, not like the 40 halftracks I have in 1/18 etc.
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:40 pm
- Location: Wahiawa, Hawaii
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:40 pm
- Location: Wahiawa, Hawaii
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
- Location: Washington DC area
- Contact:
Mike, here a few pics for you.... The first two show Dragon 1/18 figures on a WSN 1/16 T-34/85 Russian tank, but figures from 21C or BBI will work just fine as well. Most people here agree that 1/18 figures and accessories go quite well with 1/16 vehicles. The last pic shows the 1/16 T-34 next to an XD Panzer IV, ok.. the T-34/85 is bigger no doubt, but it was a slightly larger tank in real life anyways, and I think the picture illustrates that the size difference is not so glaring that you couldn't display them in a scene together. Most people agree where you run into big problems of size is when trying to display vehicles of the same type together in both scales, ie. 1/16 Tiger and XD Tiger. Hope you find the pics useful. Click the image to enlarge....MilitaryMike23 wrote:does anyone have pictures of the 1:18th infantry with 1:16th tanks and 1:16th tanks next to 1:18th tanks ... im trying to get a good sense of how much things are off as i have no 1:16th but would like to buy a few items
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:40 pm
- Location: Wahiawa, Hawaii
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:40 pm
- Location: Wahiawa, Hawaii
..
also where are sites that i can buy the items from? sites that people have used ofcourse ... thanks in advance
the last picture of the t-34 and panzer iv is a bit deceptive. I know Ostketten isn't trying to be tricky, it's just the nature of photographs.
The T-34 is further from the camera and looks smaller than it is. The 1/16 T-34 is about the same size as the xd panther and quite a bit larger looking than the panzer iv, in person. If you're somewhat knowledgeable as to the relative sizes of tanks, it will look pretty glaring.
It's for this reason i am thinking of switching entirely to 1/16 tanks, as i find that mixing 1/16 tanks with 1/18 tanks doesn't work very well, especially when you compare tanks that should be of similar size (this is very much like trying to fit a 1/16 Tiger witn a 1/18 Tiger). As an example, the 1/16 stug III will be larger and quite a bit wider than the 1/18 panzer IV, which was in reality and noticeably bigger vehicle than the stug.
Interestingly, the 1/18 figures work pretty well, largely in part to the fact that most of these figures are a bit on the big side of 1/18 anyway. Also, things like halftracks, artillery (ie the Pak), planes etc also look fine with 1/16 tanks, due to the fact there isn't a strong sense of the relative sizes between these items.
So, the bottom line is, i find that 1/16 tanks just don't go well with 1/18 tanks, but do fit pretty well with everything else, which as i said is why i'm seriously considering switching. It would be ideal to use 1/18 tanks only, of course, but since there is not very many of them and the situation is not likely to improve, using 1/16 tanks instead isn't all that bad of an option.
This is all just my personal opinion of course.....i'm sure many will disagree with me.
The T-34 is further from the camera and looks smaller than it is. The 1/16 T-34 is about the same size as the xd panther and quite a bit larger looking than the panzer iv, in person. If you're somewhat knowledgeable as to the relative sizes of tanks, it will look pretty glaring.
It's for this reason i am thinking of switching entirely to 1/16 tanks, as i find that mixing 1/16 tanks with 1/18 tanks doesn't work very well, especially when you compare tanks that should be of similar size (this is very much like trying to fit a 1/16 Tiger witn a 1/18 Tiger). As an example, the 1/16 stug III will be larger and quite a bit wider than the 1/18 panzer IV, which was in reality and noticeably bigger vehicle than the stug.
Interestingly, the 1/18 figures work pretty well, largely in part to the fact that most of these figures are a bit on the big side of 1/18 anyway. Also, things like halftracks, artillery (ie the Pak), planes etc also look fine with 1/16 tanks, due to the fact there isn't a strong sense of the relative sizes between these items.
So, the bottom line is, i find that 1/16 tanks just don't go well with 1/18 tanks, but do fit pretty well with everything else, which as i said is why i'm seriously considering switching. It would be ideal to use 1/18 tanks only, of course, but since there is not very many of them and the situation is not likely to improve, using 1/16 tanks instead isn't all that bad of an option.
This is all just my personal opinion of course.....i'm sure many will disagree with me.
i never met an airplane i didn't like...