Would you give it up?

V2 MAN · Post by **V2 MAN** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:23 pm

Well we all know how a while back 21stcentury released a article about them making a b25. Well what if you were given an option. Like if 21st century asked the customers if they would give up seeing armor and only having a few figures for 1 year if they got a 1/18 b25, a 1/18 german bomber of some sort, and a japenese bomber of some sort produced. Well my question is would yah give up armor releases and having only a few figure releases for a year just to see some awsome long awaited big heavy duty bombers be produced

Light.Inf.Scout · Post by **Light.Inf.Scout** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:43 pm

Can never give up armor. But...I would love to have those 3 bombers made.

tosborne3 · Post by **tosborne3** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:47 pm

I can't live without my troops and armor. However I do love the Bombers, but I can wait because they would probably be outa my price range anyways.

CW4USARMY · Post by **CW4USARMY** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:56 pm

Sign me up!

fuddmiester · Post by **fuddmiester** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:24 pm

Start production.... I'm strictly aircraft anyway!!

mountian-man · Post by **mountian-man** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:07 pm

ABSOLUTELY, It's about time someone produced some bombers. In the approximate decade that 1/18 Military aircraft have been released we have yet to see a twin engine bomber. (hell they aren't even doing bombers in 1/48 or 1/144 yet.... does that make any sense?)

exether_mega · Post by **exether_mega** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:26 pm

airplane canot hold the ground so armor first then airplane.

phil

USCGSARdog · Post by **USCGSARdog** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:44 pm

Absolutely, without a doubt. Especially if the future armor releases are pushing $100 a pop.

-Rob

Post by **aferguson** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:38 pm

well, since we've yet to see a new piece of armour for the last 12 months i guess that means we have 3 1/18 bombers just around the corner?

I don't expect to see any 1/18 bombers ever. Not even sure about new armour in the next year other than the KT and 88.

ostketten · Post by **ostketten** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:54 pm

I can't live without my troops and armor.

Yep... I hate to disappoint you flyboys, but you can bomb an enemy into the stone age, but to win a war you must occupy the enemy's territory, and it takes men and tanks to do that, so bring on the troops and armor.

pickelhaube · Post by **pickelhaube** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:00 pm

Well I could care less about the figs. I don't even take them out of the box when I get new aircraft or armor. I had a poll sometime ago armor vs aircraft and armor won I think 3 to 1 . I am on the fence I like both equaly . To give one up for the other ? It aint going to happen.

olifant · Post by **olifant** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:53 pm

I'm with Aferg on this one. When was the last 21C armor release? I think we have all learned to deal with sssssslllllllooooooowwwwww movement on realeases.

And hell yes, bring on the bombers!

KAMIKAZE · Post by **KAMIKAZE** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:10 pm

I would love to see three different bombers. As much as I like my armor, I think I would trade it for some bombers provided that some armor was forthcoming afterwards.

Mark

STUKA · Post by **STUKA** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:12 pm

troops and armor first.

Jesse James · Post by **Jesse James** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:05 pm

I can almost guarantee if you broke it down and were able to see the numbers, figures are probably what have helped finance the more pricey items in the line overall... At least to an extent. Figures almost always carry a toy line while the larger ticket items are usually only things that come about because of financial successes at the smaller pricepoint levels.

With that in mind, I wholely would NOT give up figures for a bomber... Not only does the reality of it not jive with me, I get a lot more out of figure collecting/display than any vehicles, armor or planes, but to be honest I'd not want to give up the armor either. Planes are nice, but I personally can live without them wheras armor and figures are what I'd prefer in general.

I'd love to see a glider or some other larger aircraft, but I'll be happy to see them only after the line's success overall makes them possible.

immeww2 · Post by **immeww2** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:29 pm

NOPE!!!!!

1958Zelda · Post by **1958Zelda** » Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:30 pm

I love armor,but we wait forever anyway,why not get the bombers.

General Blasto · Post by **General Blasto** » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:43 am

Well, seeing B-25s, Do-117s and Hienkel 111s would be nice for the hobby, BUT it takes up Soooo much room

And with the KTs to come in around $100 Each, I'm going to be selling most of my planes to pay for them. Most of the 20 some odd planes I have are NIB, never taken out. And I paid a ton for them on Evil bay, so I think I'll trade my planes for the new KTs and 88s

Da General

grunt1 · Post by **grunt1** » Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:10 pm

Been waiting forever, but I won't... give .. up.. on ... *gasp*.. armor... yet....

FieroDude · Post by **FieroDude** » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:19 pm

I voted "NO" because I like the mix. But like Aferg pointed out: what does it matter? We are already there, and I suspect we will still be there a few months from now. And short of Bill Gates suddenly bankrolling XD development, I doubt we will ever see bombers from 21st. Or even an F4.

kevrut · Post by **kevrut** » Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:11 pm

I voted "YES", but only for a U.S. 4-engine bomber.

Kevin.

General Blasto · Post by **General Blasto** » Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:35 pm

Dang, a 4 engine bomber, say a B-17 would have a wing span of what, 5 or 6 feet ??? And think of the actual weight of a complete model, even in plastic, 30 lb.s perhaps. What would the retail price of it be too, at least $500 for sure if not more, but it might look intresting

Da General

Small Scale Military Headquarters

Would you give it up?

Give up armor and have a few figs for a year just to have 3 bombers produced instead

Would you give it up?