JSI POSTED NEW SCHEME FOR ME109

Your Main Forum For Discussing 1:18 Scale Military Figures and Vehicles.
Buckyroo
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1087
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:56 pm
Location: Maryland

JSI POSTED NEW SCHEME FOR ME109

Post by Buckyroo » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:50 am

http://www.js-int.net/airscraft_60005.html

DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS OLD NEWS OR NOT, BUT I THOUGHT THAT THIS WAS A NICE SUPRISE!!!

KRIS

margras77
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:15 pm

Post by margras77 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:19 am

BF 109 actually

Nice looking paint scheme actually

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9649
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:35 am

This is a must have !!! :D :D :D
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

User avatar
aferguson
Lieutenant General - MOD
Lieutenant General - MOD
Posts: 13646
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:08 am

Post by aferguson » Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:37 am

why are they showing a new 109 scheme when they haven't even released the scheme they showed last year??
i never met an airplane i didn't like...

User avatar
B-29
Officer - 1st Lieutenant
Officer - 1st Lieutenant
Posts: 610
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 5:07 pm
Location: Arlington, TX

Post by B-29 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:42 am

Looks great! Noticed they changed the Huey and P-40 schemes as well. I hope that doesn't mean they cancelled the British P-40.
Builder and Collector of RC Aircraft

fightin
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 12:05 am
Location: near Vienna, Austria

Post by fightin » Sat Jan 16, 2010 8:09 am

wow, those three models are looking awesome!
We still need more new 1/18 aircraft!

ram04
Officer - Colonel
Officer - Colonel
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:17 pm
Location: Southern Indiana

Post by ram04 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 8:12 am

The big question is will you ever be able to buy one?

DropTank
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:39 am
Location: Texas

Post by DropTank » Sat Jan 16, 2010 8:20 am

I am curious about the JU 87 "DRIVE" bomber. :lol:
Nice looking 109.
FLY NAVY

dragon53
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 8785
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:56 pm
Location: Houston

Post by dragon53 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 8:25 am

The BF109, F4U, P-38, etc. are referrd to as "Flighter".

Sabrefan
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2310
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana. The heart of cajun country.

Post by Sabrefan » Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:09 am

Did the F-14 have SPLOTS painted on it?
Paul Hebert

It's been a long road, but I am still in the game. :)

fightin
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 12:05 am
Location: near Vienna, Austria

Post by fightin » Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:33 am

I am curious about the JU 87 "DRIVE" bomber
*thaha.... I almost fell off my chair when I read this :D
We still need more new 1/18 aircraft!

Dauntless
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 4107
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:18 am
Location: Albuquerque

Post by Dauntless » Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:41 am

I would like one, but I was hoping the first scheme would make it out the gate first. It was very Battle of Britain looking.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>=}:
Good trader list: hworth18, Threetoughtrucks, mikeg, cjg746, jlspec

bananapirate
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: WI

Post by bananapirate » Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:49 am

aw, was hopning for a G6

mountian-man
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Albany, NY

Post by mountian-man » Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:11 pm

I would like one, but I was hoping the first scheme would make it out the gate first. It was very Battle of Britain looking.
Ditto!

vmf214
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 1581
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:23 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by vmf214 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:20 pm

That's the scheme they showed at a hobby show awhile back. As far as the P-40, would much rather have the RAF scheme they originally showed. Anyone save the pic of that?

edit: found it: http://aikensairplanes.com/jsi%20models/jsi-60006.htm

fightin
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 12:05 am
Location: near Vienna, Austria

Post by fightin » Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:10 pm

Speaking of the P-40... does anyone know what paint scheme the new one is? Is it American? It doesn't have any markings or insignias.
We still need more new 1/18 aircraft!

Dauntless
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 4107
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:18 am
Location: Albuquerque

Post by Dauntless » Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:16 pm

That's a good question. At the Japan Toy show (another thread) there was a Pearl Harbor Welch 160 Tomahawk displayed.
I hope it's not that one. I already got it, along with Taylor's P-40, and they are still available on the secondary market.

They should do the British scheme they displayed first, or better yet a Russian winter one.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>=}:
Good trader list: hworth18, Threetoughtrucks, mikeg, cjg746, jlspec

hworth18
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3566
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:58 am
Location: Tulsa,Oklahoma

Post by hworth18 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:34 pm

fightin wrote:Speaking of the P-40... does anyone know what paint scheme the new one is? Is it American? It doesn't have any markings or insignias.
It almost looks like an AVG scheme without the decals.
“The moment you think you know what’s going on in a women’s head, is the moment your goose is well and truly cooked”
-Howard Stark

fightin
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 12:05 am
Location: near Vienna, Austria

Post by fightin » Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:37 pm

hworth18 wrote:
fightin wrote:Speaking of the P-40... does anyone know what paint scheme the new one is? Is it American? It doesn't have any markings or insignias.
It almost looks like an AVG scheme without the decals.
Aren't they lighter? Like, you know, the one in my avatar picture?
We still need more new 1/18 aircraft!

gouchy
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 842
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:47 am

Post by gouchy » Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:03 pm

If the pic of the P40 shown now is close to what they are planning to produce, I think its quite safe it will not be a Pearl Harbour scheme

The red spinner is more prevalent on the commonwealth forces while the green/brown camo is usually american colors.

So it could still go either way, US or commonwealth

I'm a little curious why the previous pic of the brit P40 has been changed to this one with no markings.
Not wanting to get customers hopes too high or giving themselves some leeway on accuracy or even actual scheme of finished product?

When the BOB-ish 109 was first shown, many commented it was a little plain jane, so this new scheme could be the direct result of that feedback taken to heart.

Jericoeagle1
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 978
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: Yelm, Washington

Post by Jericoeagle1 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:06 pm

fightin wrote:
hworth18 wrote: It almost looks like an AVG scheme without the decals.
Aren't they lighter? Like, you know, the one in my avatar picture?
Actually, the AVG scheme is accurate for a British camo scheme. The P-40B/C's that the Tigers used were taken over from a group of 100 that were supposed to go to the British but diverted to the AVG. So the markings are accurate for the British as well with the exception of the colored spinner which was an AVG trait.
A little song, A little dance, A little seltzer down your pants!~~~Chuckles the Clown.

mountian-man
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Albany, NY

Post by mountian-man » Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:27 pm

Well, two things to think about. I believe RAF insignas are trademarked and require royalties.

Also, if you remember 21st century toys' AVG P-40 it came with sticker roundels. Because of political incorrectness surrounding that symbol in china.

Volksdeutsch
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:53 pm

Post by Volksdeutsch » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:16 pm

from what in understand initial photos of products were basic and werent exactly what was to be released. so this may actually be the 1st scheme to hit the streets

snake
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:28 am
Location: Victoria,B.C. Canada

Post by snake » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:42 pm

That Me 109 looks much better than the one that was shown many months ago.

I would like to see a non-Galland "Battle of Britain" Me 109.Preferably of an ace,or future ace.

Not sure about the P-40.
Would have to see the markings on it first.
I would like to see in no particular order
AVG-"Flying Tigers"
RAF-"Sharkmouth"
Aleutian Tigers-Large skull on the nose. 8)

Dauntless
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 4107
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:18 am
Location: Albuquerque

Post by Dauntless » Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:49 pm

The Aleutians P-40 is my favorite. Unfortunately they can't put the Aleutians Tiger on a P-40B. By that time in 1942 the US was flying the P-40E which replaced it.

Skyworks has got a really cool one though. :?

The skull nose art is cool though. Was that on the P-40B and predated the tiger?

I know that General Chenault's son was in the Aleutians which probably inspired the tiger nose on the E's.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>=}:
Good trader list: hworth18, Threetoughtrucks, mikeg, cjg746, jlspec

Post Reply