DAK Bf-109 - Work in progress
- grunt1
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:41 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
DAK Bf-109 - Work in progress
Ok, here is the latest in my quest to customize everything that might have ever worn the DAK Afrika Braun colors.
The original (real) plane:
Progress so far:
I still need to attach some parts to make it flight worthy, weather it a bit and tune the base paintjob. Also debating on whether to remove the nose/wing blisters and the under wing guns which were not on the original.
The original (real) plane:
Progress so far:
I still need to attach some parts to make it flight worthy, weather it a bit and tune the base paintjob. Also debating on whether to remove the nose/wing blisters and the under wing guns which were not on the original.
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
-
- Officer - Lt. Colonel
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
This is great, seeing all these german custom planes. My 2 cents worth of recommendations is take the blisters off, and go for an accurate look. Anyways - nice work!
"you get in a steep dive in this thing and you've got almost no maneuvarabilty at all. You couldn't hit the broad side of a barn with the broad side of another barn"
Is it me, or is that 109 fake?
It doesnt have MGs, it's filled in
Do you know what version it is? Because if it is a G-4/5/6 it should have the bumps on top.
If the 109 is fake, the bumps would most likey be removed along with the MGs.
Either way, remove the bumps on the wings (the cannon also)
It doesnt have MGs, it's filled in
Do you know what version it is? Because if it is a G-4/5/6 it should have the bumps on top.
If the 109 is fake, the bumps would most likey be removed along with the MGs.
Either way, remove the bumps on the wings (the cannon also)
[img39]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v501/QueenofSky/BirdFlu.gif[/img39] [img39]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Acherontia_lachesis.jpg/200px-Acherontia_lachesis.jpg[/img39]
Nice work on the paint job!!!!! Looks like it will work out real nice with the new DAK figs in a dio!!!!!Again great custom!!!! ---RED---
[size=150][/size]"Take your time.Stay away from the easy going.Never go the same way twice."---GySgt Charles C. Arndt on patrolling on Guadalcanal,1942[color=#BF0000][/color]
-
- Officer - Colonel
- Posts: 1292
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:49 am
- Location: Great Britain
- Contact:
- grunt1
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:41 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Thanks guys!
Yes, I was also suprised when I found the picture to see an early BF-109G in the desert scheme so I did some further investigation.
Turns out that Black 6 is real, still flying and has an extremely well documented history!
http://www.taphilo.com/photo/pictures/bf109/index.shtml
There is also a book about it called "Black 6".
Yes, I was also suprised when I found the picture to see an early BF-109G in the desert scheme so I did some further investigation.
Turns out that Black 6 is real, still flying and has an extremely well documented history!
http://www.taphilo.com/photo/pictures/bf109/index.shtml
There is also a book about it called "Black 6".
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
-
- Officer - Colonel
- Posts: 1292
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:49 am
- Location: Great Britain
- Contact:
Hey Grunt1 if you have any or access to some of the Old German Propoganda magazines,there are some Great photos of Mess BF109s in Africa serving with the DAK.
One in particular (I`ll see if I can find the photo if interested) is a nicely camo`d Mess 109 that blends in really well with the land below for Allied planes to miss if they were flying above it.
Nice to see that you found some more out about the one your doing too
Ja
Steel Bonnet
One in particular (I`ll see if I can find the photo if interested) is a nicely camo`d Mess 109 that blends in really well with the land below for Allied planes to miss if they were flying above it.
Nice to see that you found some more out about the one your doing too
Ja
Steel Bonnet
-
- Officer - Lt. Colonel
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:58 pm
- Location: South Florida
That is one sweet ass 109G! Very nice.
The newest G model that made it to North Africa was the G-2. These had neither the cowl blisters nor the underwing cannon.
Here's one example of a Tropical 109G-2
and another
TKO has said the 109G mold was designed with different variants in mind. If you look at the underwing pods and cowl blisters, you will see that they are indeed separate pieces, and not part of the fuselage/wing molds. If I was doing this custom, I would remove the pods/blisters. This, however, isn't my plane.
The newest G model that made it to North Africa was the G-2. These had neither the cowl blisters nor the underwing cannon.
Here's one example of a Tropical 109G-2
and another
TKO has said the 109G mold was designed with different variants in mind. If you look at the underwing pods and cowl blisters, you will see that they are indeed separate pieces, and not part of the fuselage/wing molds. If I was doing this custom, I would remove the pods/blisters. This, however, isn't my plane.
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. No use being a damn fool about it.
-W.C. Fields
-W.C. Fields
-
- Officer - Lt. Colonel
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:58 pm
- Location: South Florida
I just decided to turn my Seemann 109G-6 into a G-2. Step one was to gently pry one of the cowl blisters off. The one I pulled off required very little effort and came of pretty clean. This was due to there only being glue on the blister's tab. There might be glue all the way around the blister's edge, so your results may vary. I don't have a camera here but I'll try to describe it. Here's approximately what the slot in the cowl looks like. It should be easy enough to fill in.
The underwing cannon pods are held on by only two round tabs with a small amount of glue on the tabs themselves. I didn't see any glue along the edges of the pod. While the pod required more effort to pop off, it wasn't excessive and didn't cause any damage to the wing. The larger of the two holes is only about 1/8" in diameter, and the smaller about 3/32". They should be easy to fill as well.
The blisters on top of the wings are part of the mold, however, and beyond my ablities. This should be fun. Thanks for the inspiration!
The underwing cannon pods are held on by only two round tabs with a small amount of glue on the tabs themselves. I didn't see any glue along the edges of the pod. While the pod required more effort to pop off, it wasn't excessive and didn't cause any damage to the wing. The larger of the two holes is only about 1/8" in diameter, and the smaller about 3/32". They should be easy to fill as well.
The blisters on top of the wings are part of the mold, however, and beyond my ablities. This should be fun. Thanks for the inspiration!
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. No use being a damn fool about it.
-W.C. Fields
-W.C. Fields
- grunt1
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:41 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Finally got around to moving this project forward..
Mixed up some paint for the lower fuselage that worked pretty well.
Also took off the engine blisters, wing ammo blisters and the under wing cannons (will soon be attached to a DAK Stuka..).
As FL indicated, the engine blisters and wing cannons pop off fairly easily.
The ammo blisters on the wings were the only ones that were actually part of the mold but those dremeled out nicely. Waiting for the squadron putty to dry now.
Mixed up some paint for the lower fuselage that worked pretty well.
Also took off the engine blisters, wing ammo blisters and the under wing cannons (will soon be attached to a DAK Stuka..).
As FL indicated, the engine blisters and wing cannons pop off fairly easily.
The ammo blisters on the wings were the only ones that were actually part of the mold but those dremeled out nicely. Waiting for the squadron putty to dry now.
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
G'day Grunt
Good to see you that your going all out to alter the aircraft to a correct G2 state, just one point though the blisters in the wings are not ammo blisters but were to allow the thicker cord wheels of the I think the G4, 5 and 6 to fit into the wheel wells, the cord was increased again on the k models and this is why they have a blistered panel the runs the complete cord of the wing.
The engine cowl blisters were for the ammo feeds of the MGs however, this was necessary to allow the feeds to fit around the mountings of the new engines of the G4, G5, G6 and G14 models, again the Ks, G10 and G14AS had a further alteration to accommodate their even larger power plants.
Good to see you that your going all out to alter the aircraft to a correct G2 state, just one point though the blisters in the wings are not ammo blisters but were to allow the thicker cord wheels of the I think the G4, 5 and 6 to fit into the wheel wells, the cord was increased again on the k models and this is why they have a blistered panel the runs the complete cord of the wing.
The engine cowl blisters were for the ammo feeds of the MGs however, this was necessary to allow the feeds to fit around the mountings of the new engines of the G4, G5, G6 and G14 models, again the Ks, G10 and G14AS had a further alteration to accommodate their even larger power plants.
SPUD
Something's up with photobucket?????
Something's up with photobucket?????
- grunt1
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:41 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Thank goodness.. Since I've already chopped her up..
Thanks for the detail spud!
Btw, if on the first photo I posted in this thread of the real G2, if I was able to get a closer shot of the nose art would you be able to do your magic on it?
Thanks for the detail spud!
Btw, if on the first photo I posted in this thread of the real G2, if I was able to get a closer shot of the nose art would you be able to do your magic on it?
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
G'day Grunt
Remember to always check before you chop, anyway the wing blisters were actually introduced with the G3, one model before what I remembered, I went and checked.
The G2 pictured Black 6 was reportedly captured by Australian troops just a little trivia.
Now if what you are referring to as nose art is the Brown "RLM 26 " Rotring (oil) triangles, well I have already created these as they were used on my Stuka decal sheets (even though mine are a little more a red than brown due to the printer output) and I'd expect that they would be the same as those used on the Bf109 the Oxygen stencil for example should also be simular if not the same.
Heres a quick 10 minute stencil example I put together, all except the electrical inlet are artwork from the existing Stuka sheet.
Let me know if this is what you are talking about.
As I'm going to be the owner of a Bf109G6 soon myself, I am contemplating working up some decals and stencils for this aircraft, however I still have to complete some F16 decals first and may also be working on some custom Avenger decals soon fore FieroDude.
Remember to always check before you chop, anyway the wing blisters were actually introduced with the G3, one model before what I remembered, I went and checked.
The G2 pictured Black 6 was reportedly captured by Australian troops just a little trivia.
Now if what you are referring to as nose art is the Brown "RLM 26 " Rotring (oil) triangles, well I have already created these as they were used on my Stuka decal sheets (even though mine are a little more a red than brown due to the printer output) and I'd expect that they would be the same as those used on the Bf109 the Oxygen stencil for example should also be simular if not the same.
Heres a quick 10 minute stencil example I put together, all except the electrical inlet are artwork from the existing Stuka sheet.
Let me know if this is what you are talking about.
As I'm going to be the owner of a Bf109G6 soon myself, I am contemplating working up some decals and stencils for this aircraft, however I still have to complete some F16 decals first and may also be working on some custom Avenger decals soon fore FieroDude.
SPUD
Something's up with photobucket?????
Something's up with photobucket?????
Now Grunt
Now that your going to all the trouble to convert your Bf109 to a G2 it would a shame to see you add the under wing cannons to your Ju87B.
Putting the guns on any Stuka let alone Ju87B , well that might work for Hollywood or comics but I’d advise against it, instead you should get a pair of Bf109 drop tanks and convert your Stuka to a long range Ju87R model very much in use in Africa.
The 4 left over bombs could then all be used on a custom made multiple ejector rack which could be attached the centreline of your 109 for Jabo missions.
Much more historic, but hey that's just me
Now that your going to all the trouble to convert your Bf109 to a G2 it would a shame to see you add the under wing cannons to your Ju87B.
Putting the guns on any Stuka let alone Ju87B , well that might work for Hollywood or comics but I’d advise against it, instead you should get a pair of Bf109 drop tanks and convert your Stuka to a long range Ju87R model very much in use in Africa.
The 4 left over bombs could then all be used on a custom made multiple ejector rack which could be attached the centreline of your 109 for Jabo missions.
Much more historic, but hey that's just me
SPUD
Something's up with photobucket?????
Something's up with photobucket?????
- grunt1
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:41 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Ok, first off your decal work (as always) is amazing..
As for the cannons, you are totally right. It wasn't until I had them removed from the 109 that I really thought about it. From the reference books I have they are clearly undersized.
Now the good news is even though the pods are undersized, the barrels are spot on for the MG 151/20s that replaced a lot of the MG17s.
Only question is whether or not those upgrades started in Afrika or later because the Stuka I am working on right now is also a DAK.
If that doesn't pan out research wise then the 87R is a great suggestion. (We must be looking at the same books).
Regarding pre-chop checking, I did that in this case (not always)..
Here is a sample of what I had to work with. Note that the nose art I was referring to was _not_ in the above photo as I mentioned. Sorry bout that! But it _is_ in this first photo:
More here: http://www.taphilo.com/Photo/Pictures/BF109/index.shtml
The 32x DAK 109 from 21st Century is also a nice reference.
No blisters..
As for the cannons, you are totally right. It wasn't until I had them removed from the 109 that I really thought about it. From the reference books I have they are clearly undersized.
Now the good news is even though the pods are undersized, the barrels are spot on for the MG 151/20s that replaced a lot of the MG17s.
Only question is whether or not those upgrades started in Afrika or later because the Stuka I am working on right now is also a DAK.
If that doesn't pan out research wise then the 87R is a great suggestion. (We must be looking at the same books).
Regarding pre-chop checking, I did that in this case (not always)..
Here is a sample of what I had to work with. Note that the nose art I was referring to was _not_ in the above photo as I mentioned. Sorry bout that! But it _is_ in this first photo:
More here: http://www.taphilo.com/Photo/Pictures/BF109/index.shtml
The 32x DAK 109 from 21st Century is also a nice reference.
No blisters..
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
-------- Need a list of everything 1:18? --------
---------- http://www.sshqdb.com --------------
---- Built by the community, for the community ----
-----------------------------------------------------------
My Store: http://www.battlegroundmodels.com
-
- Officer - Brigadier General
- Posts: 11238
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Central California
Great work on that DAK Bf-109! For whatever reason I really like the 109 in desert tan and your model is doing it justice! I've seen the actual Bf-109G-2 you are using as a reference. If you ever get the chance to go to England, its currently on display at the RAF Museum at Hendon, which is a suburb just north of London. The museum is deffinitely worth a visit, especially for the rare British and German WWII aircraft they have on display
I took this photo in March of 2005.
I took this photo in March of 2005.
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."
G'day Grunt
You are right in saying the Ju87 were armed with wing cannons but unfortunately it was not on the B or R models that the 21stCT example can represent.
The first cannon armed examples were the Ju87D5, the Ds had the redesigned engine cowl, canopy and landing gear spats. The spats had a fabric or leather section to allow for the compression movement of the landing gear oleo, which is evident in your image, some early D models retained the B/R spats but these were well a truly gone by the time of the D5 production.
Sorry to be bearer of bad news, but to make up for it I will check into my references for the unit emblem you seek.
You are right in saying the Ju87 were armed with wing cannons but unfortunately it was not on the B or R models that the 21stCT example can represent.
The first cannon armed examples were the Ju87D5, the Ds had the redesigned engine cowl, canopy and landing gear spats. The spats had a fabric or leather section to allow for the compression movement of the landing gear oleo, which is evident in your image, some early D models retained the B/R spats but these were well a truly gone by the time of the D5 production.
Sorry to be bearer of bad news, but to make up for it I will check into my references for the unit emblem you seek.
SPUD
Something's up with photobucket?????
Something's up with photobucket?????
Bf. 109 Unit Badge
III./J.G. 77 from what I see of it.......