Browning 50 cal MG to be replaced

This is the place to put those reference links, posts on books, movies, photos, and etc.
Post Reply
dragon53
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 8764
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:56 pm
Location: Houston

Browning 50 cal MG to be replaced

Post by dragon53 » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:31 am


MG40K
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: US TX DFW

Post by MG40K » Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:00 pm

I guess when you have over 60 years of service, its time to be replaced.
Well, goodbye great weapon. To bad, that was my favorite HMG of all time. :cry:
[img]http://i514.photobucket.com/albums/t345/MG40K/M1A1-Bagdad-RunningOver.jpg[/img]

ostketten
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3240
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
Location: Washington DC area
Contact:

Post by ostketten » Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:56 pm

It's worth noting that the weapon is being retired, but not the cartridge it fires, that will remain the same for the new weapon being designed by General Dynamics. In a way I can see why this is being done, the M2 is a big heavy old sucker, and the move to a lighter weapon with equal or superior performance makes sense for the future.
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"

kduck
Officer - 1st Lieutenant
Officer - 1st Lieutenant
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:08 pm
Location: Locust Grove, GA

Post by kduck » Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:26 pm

Even though it's extremely heavy and can be difficult for an inexperienced soldier to properly set up it's a great weapon. As much as I hated Grafenwoehr, I always enjoyed going to the MG range there to fire the 50. Whenever I fired that weapon I was always awed by the sheer sense of power you felt when doing so.

Oh well I guess that's progress. I agree that it's time for a lighter more advanced weapon. Hopefully the military will get as much use from it's replacement.

olifant
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2537
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:51 am
Location: 1, USA, Olympia, Washington

Post by olifant » Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:33 pm

Thanks for the insight Grog. If something's not broken, don't fix it!
[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=375&i=sshqvdjx0.jpg][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.937d18e174.jpg[/img][/url]

ostketten
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3240
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
Location: Washington DC area
Contact:

Post by ostketten » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:42 am

No, all being said, the Ma Duce will serve on for at least another 10-20 years
Probably true. Like most things in the US military and Govt., the wheels grind verrrrry slooooowly... :lol:
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"

Post Reply