21C AC: New molds or new pieces?

Your forum dedicated to 1/32nd and smaller plastic and metal figures and vehicles.
Post Reply

21C: New molds or new pieces?

New molds with improved quality on existing AC releases
1
4%
New molds of never before done pieces
27
96%
 
Total votes: 28

olifant
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2537
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:51 am
Location: 1, USA, Olympia, Washington

21C AC: New molds or new pieces?

Post by olifant » Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:35 pm

Given the talk around the new Mustang D model, would you rather see new molds of old planes (Me-262, Thunderbolt, Warhawk, etc) to improve the quality or new molds (Lightning, Spitfire, ?) of never before done pieces?

I would prefer new molds of never before done pieces.

Disclaimer: I feel any work from 21C is positive.
[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=375&i=sshqvdjx0.jpg][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.937d18e174.jpg[/img][/url]

hworth18
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3566
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:58 am
Location: Tulsa,Oklahoma

Post by hworth18 » Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:49 pm

I would like to see new planes, BUT, I would also like 21st to redo some of their classic planes like the Bf-109E and Me-262.. I am not asking for a complete retool, but just enough to update the molds to more current standards.. :wink:
“The moment you think you know what’s going on in a women’s head, is the moment your goose is well and truly cooked”
-Howard Stark

tmanthegreat
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 11238
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Central California

Post by tmanthegreat » Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:47 am

hworth18 wrote:I would like to see new planes, BUT, I would also like 21st to redo some of their classic planes like the Bf-109E and Me-262.. I am not asking for a complete retool, but just enough to update the molds to more current standards.. :wink:
I second all of that :wink: The 32x planes from really the FW-190D on have been terrific in terms of detail and accuracy. The early P-51D, ME-262, and Bf-109E, however, are certainly not up to the level of the latest releases. Therefore, I'm glad to see 21c revisiting the P-51D 8)
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."

Jagdpanther
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 3:57 am
Location: Warren County,NJ

Post by Jagdpanther » Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:22 am

Its great that 21st is doing retool of its P51-D. But I would also like to see the older molds retooled, but then again new planes would be just has good.
[img88]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s281/army5551/160392_1114600356-1.jpg[/img88]

Quixote511
Officer - Colonel
Officer - Colonel
Posts: 1383
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 4:27 am
Location: 1, USA, Ohio, in between Dayton and Cincy

Post by Quixote511 » Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:13 am

While a retool of the 51 is nice, I am looking for more variety. Typhoon-Hurricane, Mossie, Black Widow-----you get the idea.
Aaron

My pathetic fantasy football team:

[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/1804/polocksia2.jpg[/img][/url]

nooker21
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 321
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:32 am
Location: Anaheim, CA

Post by nooker21 » Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:38 am

I'd be happy if they kept making smaller versions of the ones they've already produced in 1/18, especially the spitfire, avenger, and lightning. Oh, and a razorback thunderbolt, if that doesn't count as going back and redoing a plane...

olifant
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2537
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:51 am
Location: 1, USA, Olympia, Washington

Post by olifant » Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:31 pm

I am with you Nooker. If we are going to see a Thunderbolt re-tool I think the razorback would make more sense.

TKO, I am not sure you are in the know on this, but I have wondered how 21C is doing the mold mods. I work in the plastics industry and spent time about a decade ago working with injection applications. There are two ways you could modify molds when working with a P-51 B/C vs. the D model:

1) Design the mold with interchangable parts surrounding the cockpit/upper rear fuselage so you could swap out going from variant to variant. This is the more expensive way to go and can be problematic with mold lines.

2) Run all the production you want on the mold prior to permanently modifying it for future runs. It is much easier to remove material rather than micorweld it back in. In this scenario 21C would run all the B/C variants then modify the mold by machining away material to end up with a D variant.

My guess would be that 21C opted for option 1 for future flexibility. In that event we would see both new Thunderbolt variants. In the event they chose option 2 we better scoop up all the Mustang B/Cs as there will be no more in the pipeline.

There is the possibility they have made two molds for the two variants but this is more expensive. With auto-cad downloaded to machining equipment most of the cost is in the engineering labor; the only difference is equipment time and steel. I don't know what set up the factory uses though; it could range from top-of-the-line-we-handing-American-tool-shops-their-hats-with-our-cheap-labor to some old master mold maker hand machining the molds and running them on a little old 20 ton molder.

This area is outside my trained vocation so maybe someone else could comment. Spudkopf, I think you are in the industry aren't you?

TKO, can you weigh in if you know? It doesn't really matter as I will buy them even if they are carved from solid blocks of resin by artesian craftsman but it would be nice to know.
[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=375&i=sshqvdjx0.jpg][img]http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5374/sshqvdjx0.937d18e174.jpg[/img][/url]

1958Zelda
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 1:01 pm
Location: SPOKANE, WA

Post by 1958Zelda » Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:55 pm

I agree,I would prefer new planes such as the p-38.

General custer
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:30 am
Location: Perpignan, FRANCE
Contact:

Post by General custer » Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:53 pm

Please diversify your production! Enough Tigers, Panthers, Sherman and other Panzer IV!

WW2 is however fertile in tanks in all kinds! We want original models, we need KV-1, JS III and ISU152, Churchill, Crusader and Comet, M10 Destroyer ...

And if you want to make profitable models already existing, Nasshorn and Hummer can be made on the basis of your PzKfw4, Sturmtiger on that of Tiger I, etc..

And then , the history of the armoured production is not limited to WW2! Thus... Centurions, Chieftains and Conquerors! M47, M48 and M103! T54 and T62! AMX50 , ARL44 and Leclerc!
__________________

RAD 2112
Officer - Major
Officer - Major
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:59 am
Location: New Jersey

Post by RAD 2112 » Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:49 pm

I'm putting my vote in for a 357th P-51D with "Passion Wagon" on it.
OR
Captain Chuck Weaver's P-51D. ;)

Post Reply