What should the next 1/18 scale armor be ? Closed

Your Main Forum For Discussing 1:18 Scale Military Figures and Vehicles.

What should the next custom armor be ?

1. Jagdtiger
3
6%
2. Stuart
18
35%
3. Grant
1
2%
4. T- 34 / 76-42 ALL STEEL WHEELS
12
24%
5. Greyhound
4
8%
6. Hetzer
8
16%
7. M-3 Tank Destroyer
1
2%
8. Mause
2
4%
9. Puma
2
4%
 
Total votes: 51

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9648
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

What should the next 1/18 scale armor be ? Closed

Post by pickelhaube » Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:39 pm

Ok after the Sdkfz 222 I will be doing the Spitfire V A/ B with clipped wings and vokes filter.

Then I will do another piece of armor.

I will do a few quickies first. Here they are

Wading breathers for the Shermy
Ben Hur trailer
50 cal shield with square turret for Hummer
Maybe the Firefly

I want to do a few Panzer Mk-IV pieces but there are not a lot of them out there . If JSI releases more of them I will jump on those mods.

The T-34 /76 will be alot easier to do than a T-34/85. That is why I went with that one.

But I will do a full blown armor piece from the ground up .

I will do a follow up with the top 5 choices. Then maybe a run off.
Last edited by pickelhaube on Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

MG-42
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3583
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:42 am
Location: Pleasant Ridge , Ohio

* How many more times ???

Post by MG-42 » Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:41 am

* :roll: ? ... I haven't a clue ,.. but actually , my vote is for the T-34/76 '42 instead of the Puma I initially voted for Matt. :oops:


- Mitch v MG
" I love it , God help me ,.. I do love it so". * * * * PATTON * * * *



* In memory of ram04 - 7/15/12 *

snake
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:28 am
Location: Victoria,B.C. Canada

Post by snake » Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:32 am

From that list has to be the T-34/76.
Why can't you do a /85.Probably a lot more popular?
Just "constructive" criticism.

KWR190
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 4:45 pm
Location: Olympia,WA
Contact:

Post by KWR190 » Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:57 am

Pickel quick question does the SDKFZ 222 share any parts with the Puma?

1958Zelda
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 1:01 pm
Location: SPOKANE, WA

Post by 1958Zelda » Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:42 am

Voted for the t 34 but would be happy with any on the list,don't forget some 251 halftrack mods,lots of 251's out there,and genrally low cost.

User avatar
YT
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 2128
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:40 pm
Location: Central IL

Post by YT » Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:46 am

T-34 all the way, have you ever thought about a Hellcat?

ostketten
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3240
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
Location: Washington DC area
Contact:

Post by ostketten » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:29 am

I voted T-34, but my preference would be for an IS-2 Stalin. For anyone who cares, it's been reported that Heng Long will be releasing an M4A3 Sherman and a new build Panther G (1/16 RC naturally) in the very near future, rumor has it the Sherm will be along very soon, like in a few weeks or a month perhaps, and the Panther possibly by years end. I haven't really kept close tabs on 1/16 RC lately, but this info comes from RCU, and they seem to have their finger on the pulse of new & upcoming offerings in the world of 1/16 armor.
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"

Threetoughtrucks
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 5405
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:46 am
Location: SOUTH JOISEY
Contact:

Post by Threetoughtrucks » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:52 am

T-34...... but who cares about steel wheels unless they are cheaper than plastic or resin???

TTT
Sometimes I am the windshield, sometimes, I am the bug.

ostketten
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3240
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
Location: Washington DC area
Contact:

Post by ostketten » Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:34 am

but who cares about steel wheels unless they are cheaper than plastic or resin???
Certain T-34's (Chelyabinsk..??) were produced with a mix of all steel (inner) and rubber rimmed (outer) roadwheels to conserve rubber which was in short supply. It made for a rough (and noisy) ride in a tank that was already not well known for it's "creature comforts"... :lol:
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"

uksubs
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Officer - 2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 372
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:44 am

Post by uksubs » Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:44 pm

I voted jagdpanther 8)

exether_mega
Officer - Colonel
Officer - Colonel
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:35 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by exether_mega » Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:23 pm

Stuart by all means !

phil

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9648
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:41 pm

ostketten wrote:
but who cares about steel wheels unless they are cheaper than plastic or resin???
Certain T-34's (Chelyabinsk..??) were produced with a mix of all steel (inner) and rubber rimmed (outer) roadwheels to conserve rubber which was in short supply. It made for a rough (and noisy) ride in a tank that was already not well known for it's "creature comforts"... :lol:
The reason I said T-34/76 rather than 85 is the steel wheels will be MUCH EASIER TO DO.

I know about the rubber wheels front and back that is a T-34/76-43.

Those 85 wheels will be a SOB to do . Bad enough I have to make the tracks from scratch.

The 222 has no parts that match to the Puma as I know about. Maybe some hinges.

The Hellcat is a total scratch as well.

I would have to make all of the running gear. This would be pricy to do and as far as American tanks go I do not think that it would sell. The M-10 was a success but barely.

This whole poll may be mute because sales are dropping big time. I have had about 4 guys back out of the 222 because of finances. I think that is my best looking project to date.

I hope this recession thing ends quick.
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

normandy
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 6028
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 6:30 pm
Location: Atlantic Coast

Post by normandy » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:14 pm

This was a difficult choice for me, I want them all. I went with the Hetzer because it seems to be the easiest in terms of Sculpting and Mold making. Pickel should have this done in a few days. :P :wink:
As for the Jagdtiger....Pickel I'd hold off for a while and see if 21st's King Tiger shows up from a different company. No need to start (a Jagdtiger) from the ground up on this one....yet.
The T-34 is a must do! It's beyond me why we haven't seen it in this scale. I thought FOV would have knocked one out by now.
I hope by mid week we'll narrow it down to 2 or 3 choices.
Pickel keep up the Great work!!!!!!!!

Threetoughtrucks
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 5405
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:46 am
Location: SOUTH JOISEY
Contact:

Post by Threetoughtrucks » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:21 pm

I Vote T-34 with steel wheels for PH's reason...........cost and easier manufacture. :wink:

TTT
Sometimes I am the windshield, sometimes, I am the bug.

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9648
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:24 pm

Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

Jesse James
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3484
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:37 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Post by Jesse James » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:37 pm

I voted Stuart as it's a fav o mine, but the M3 Tank Destroyer is a very close 2nd for me.
http://www.JediDefender.com Bringing Balance to the Force
http://www.FFURG.com The Ultimate Customizing Resource.
Now Hasbro, make us some Head Sculpt & Endor Uniform variations! The new Rebel Fleet Trooper gets the JJ Seal of Approval Though!

Fritzkrieg
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 835
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:49 pm

Post by Fritzkrieg » Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:41 am

I really like the astetics of the stuart. To me the Stuart and the Hellcat, were the only good looking allied Tanks.

GooglyDoogly
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 5:59 pm

Post by GooglyDoogly » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:45 am

Psst...make an IS-2 conversion kit for the 1/16 KV-1 chassis...the 1/16th RC crowd would eat that up.

That would be a relatively easy project for you to do.
:D

pickelhaube
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 9648
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: New Orleans

Post by pickelhaube » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:28 pm

GooglyDoogly wrote:Psst...make an IS-2 conversion kit for the 1/16 KV-1 chassis...the 1/16th RC crowd would eat that up.

That would be a relatively easy project for you to do.
:D
What would be involved in doing this ?
Kirk Douglas : Mine hit the ground first
John Wayne : Mine was taller



Image

GooglyDoogly
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Officer - Lt. Colonel
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 5:59 pm

Post by GooglyDoogly » Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:56 pm

pickelhaube wrote:
GooglyDoogly wrote:Psst...make an IS-2 conversion kit for the 1/16 KV-1 chassis...the 1/16th RC crowd would eat that up.

That would be a relatively easy project for you to do.
:D
What would be involved in doing this ?
It would be like your M-10 conversion kit. A new turret would have to be made, barrel, and muzzlebreak. Not sure if it would be a problem, but the turret would have to be hollow, because most (if not all) 1/16 modelers would be putting RC components inside the turret.

The KV-1 and the IS-2 uses the same chassis, tracks, etc, so you wouldn't have to worry about making those. There's some difference on the upper hull, but overall, the Stalin's shape is so angular, it wouldn't be too hard to mold it.

bananapirate
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: WI

Post by bananapirate » Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:27 pm

GooglyDoogly wrote:Psst...make an IS-2 conversion kit for the 1/16 KV-1 chassis...the 1/16th RC crowd would eat that up.

That would be a relatively easy project for you to do.
:D
I would be ALL OVER that

I prefer 1/18 myself, but I feel the trumpeter 1/16 t34s (76 & 85, static or RC) really fill the void for that piece even being 1/16.

I would love a stuart though, small fun and cheap

1958Zelda
Officer - Captain
Officer - Captain
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 1:01 pm
Location: SPOKANE, WA

Post by 1958Zelda » Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:38 am

Which Stuart ? M5a,not that it matters,I'll take either one.

tmanthegreat
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 11238
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Central California

Post by tmanthegreat » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:49 am

Tough call. I would argue that from the above list the T-34 and Stuart (M-5 variant) are the most sorely needed in 1:18. The fact that they were not taken on by at least 21c surprises me. The T-34 (in general) was one of the most important armored vehicles of the war and was just as important for the Russians as the Sherman was for the US. Then there is the M-5 Stuart. 21c had both RC and non-RC versions in 1:6 scale and several repaints of one in 1:32 scale. I would have though we would have seen one of those in 1:18 early on - certainly before some of the more obscure pieces 21c made.

So that is where I stand on the issue - divided. I voted for the Stuart, but would just as much love to see a T-34.
"If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."

ostketten
Officer - Brigadier General
Officer - Brigadier General
Posts: 3240
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:23 am
Location: Washington DC area
Contact:

Post by ostketten » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:48 pm

Psst...make an IS-2 conversion kit for the 1/16 KV-1 chassis...the 1/16th RC crowd would eat that up
Brilliant idea... :idea: 8)
Gen. George S. Patton Jr., 28th Regimental Colonel, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army, "Blood and Steel"

forcerecon85
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:24 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by forcerecon85 » Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:49 am

M551 Sheridan for me and a C2A6 Leopard. Plenty of schemes for a Leopard :)

Post Reply